What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
New Allbinos Review of Monarch HG 10x42
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Robert Wallace" data-source="post: 3533095" data-attributes="member: 5690"><p>Fair enough but the Zeiss SFs are over twice as much money to buy compared to the Nikon.</p><p></p><p>On a personal note I haven't used my Zeiss 10x Dialyts very often since I bought the 7x42 phase corrected Dialyts about 18 years ago.</p><p>My default binocular for birding are now the Swarovski 8x32s and are likely to remain so.</p><p>I am now into my 70s and the Nikon seems to have decent enough optics and importantly to me a compact size and light weight compared to most of its rivals. Which is why I am seriously considering buying a pair.</p><p>At the Rutland Birdfair I thought the Leica Noctovids the best binoculars I've looked through (highly subjective)but too heavy and the Zeiss SF too large. I described the Nikons in a previous post as sub alpha probably because I looked through them fairly soon after the Leicas and it was not a side by side comparison. </p><p>I shall now look for an opportunity to re-assess the Nikons.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Robert Wallace, post: 3533095, member: 5690"] Fair enough but the Zeiss SFs are over twice as much money to buy compared to the Nikon. On a personal note I haven't used my Zeiss 10x Dialyts very often since I bought the 7x42 phase corrected Dialyts about 18 years ago. My default binocular for birding are now the Swarovski 8x32s and are likely to remain so. I am now into my 70s and the Nikon seems to have decent enough optics and importantly to me a compact size and light weight compared to most of its rivals. Which is why I am seriously considering buying a pair. At the Rutland Birdfair I thought the Leica Noctovids the best binoculars I've looked through (highly subjective)but too heavy and the Zeiss SF too large. I described the Nikons in a previous post as sub alpha probably because I looked through them fairly soon after the Leicas and it was not a side by side comparison. I shall now look for an opportunity to re-assess the Nikons. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
New Allbinos Review of Monarch HG 10x42
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top