What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
New Allbinos Review of Monarch HG 10x42
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="typo" data-source="post: 3534749" data-attributes="member: 83808"><p>CJ,</p><p></p><p>Maybe the wine was a bad choice. How about shoes? Will you be campaining for the maunfacturers to display the external length +/- 0.5mm? The internal sizing might not be perfect for everyone but surely it's a better starting point?</p><p></p><p>I've added three more binoculars to the list so size wise I'm now going from an 9x28 to a 10x56. The diameters for the highest points on the eyecups range from 33 to 42mm. My preferred available ER setting all 6 is still 11 to 12mm with a tollerance of 10 to 14mm. My prescription is fairly weak but I'm sure those with a stronger prescription most would figure out if there is a millimetre or so more leeway with a wider eyecup.</p><p></p><p>By my estimates the true ER of these are all very similar, between 18.5 and 19.5mm However the lost distance between the eyepiece lens and the lowest eyecup setting ranged from 2.5 to about 6.5mm meaning the available ER ranged from 12 to 17.5mm. With my weak prescription, close fitting, rimless glasses all are fine for me but I know you have mentioned ER issues once or twice in the past (<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />). Which binocular (or measurement) do you imagine would be the best bet for you? </p><p></p><p>Getting back to the MHG. I've only tried them for short while at the UK launch day. I spent more time with the 8x and I'm pretty sure I twisted out the 8x eycups a fraction but sorry, I don't remember if I did the same for the 10x. The ER is listed at 17.8 and 17.0mm respectively. From other Nikons I've tried I would guess they normally use true ER. </p><p></p><p>David</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="typo, post: 3534749, member: 83808"] CJ, Maybe the wine was a bad choice. How about shoes? Will you be campaining for the maunfacturers to display the external length +/- 0.5mm? The internal sizing might not be perfect for everyone but surely it's a better starting point? I've added three more binoculars to the list so size wise I'm now going from an 9x28 to a 10x56. The diameters for the highest points on the eyecups range from 33 to 42mm. My preferred available ER setting all 6 is still 11 to 12mm with a tollerance of 10 to 14mm. My prescription is fairly weak but I'm sure those with a stronger prescription most would figure out if there is a millimetre or so more leeway with a wider eyecup. By my estimates the true ER of these are all very similar, between 18.5 and 19.5mm However the lost distance between the eyepiece lens and the lowest eyecup setting ranged from 2.5 to about 6.5mm meaning the available ER ranged from 12 to 17.5mm. With my weak prescription, close fitting, rimless glasses all are fine for me but I know you have mentioned ER issues once or twice in the past (;)). Which binocular (or measurement) do you imagine would be the best bet for you? Getting back to the MHG. I've only tried them for short while at the UK launch day. I spent more time with the 8x and I'm pretty sure I twisted out the 8x eycups a fraction but sorry, I don't remember if I did the same for the 10x. The ER is listed at 17.8 and 17.0mm respectively. From other Nikons I've tried I would guess they normally use true ER. David [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
New Allbinos Review of Monarch HG 10x42
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top