What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
New Allbinos Review of Monarch HG 10x42
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="typo" data-source="post: 3535238" data-attributes="member: 83808"><p>CJ,</p><p></p><p>I suspect knowing that information will often provide little, or possibly no help at all in predicting whether spectacle frame would be compatible with an eyecup design.</p><p></p><p>You can see from the attached photo that, not only that I perhaps lack a little imagination when it choice of frames, but how even tiny differences in design can make a difference to binocular usability.</p><p></p><p>Of those three designs, only one of them causes me a problem when using binoculars, and then with only one model out of those six I've mentioned. The model in question has exactly the same distance between the high points on the eyecup rim as the Prime, but the problematic one has a more acute external radius. It means that the ends of the metal bridge pivot between the eyecup surfaces meaning it's difficult to get the lenses flat against the eyecups. Drives me mad. The dilemma is, I could order that same frame again and it would be fine if the technician set the reading point on the lens a couple of milimeters higher or lower. It wouldn't be a problem if my IPD was 2mm wider or narrower. In fact I could probably get the frame fitting guy to alter the position of the pads a little and it would work fine. </p><p></p><p>It's the near design that is the problem with the model I own, but I know from going round the stands at BirdFair that the middle one has a couple of incompatibilities too. The far one caused few problems, but it's rare enough with the others not to be an condideration. </p><p></p><p>The nearer two spectacles actually have identical lenses, but it was the nearest that was intended as my birding specs. The frames were half the price of the others, as I expect you can tell. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Neither true ER nor available ER would be any help in this case.</p><p></p><p>David</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="typo, post: 3535238, member: 83808"] CJ, I suspect knowing that information will often provide little, or possibly no help at all in predicting whether spectacle frame would be compatible with an eyecup design. You can see from the attached photo that, not only that I perhaps lack a little imagination when it choice of frames, but how even tiny differences in design can make a difference to binocular usability. Of those three designs, only one of them causes me a problem when using binoculars, and then with only one model out of those six I've mentioned. The model in question has exactly the same distance between the high points on the eyecup rim as the Prime, but the problematic one has a more acute external radius. It means that the ends of the metal bridge pivot between the eyecup surfaces meaning it's difficult to get the lenses flat against the eyecups. Drives me mad. The dilemma is, I could order that same frame again and it would be fine if the technician set the reading point on the lens a couple of milimeters higher or lower. It wouldn't be a problem if my IPD was 2mm wider or narrower. In fact I could probably get the frame fitting guy to alter the position of the pads a little and it would work fine. It's the near design that is the problem with the model I own, but I know from going round the stands at BirdFair that the middle one has a couple of incompatibilities too. The far one caused few problems, but it's rare enough with the others not to be an condideration. The nearer two spectacles actually have identical lenses, but it was the nearest that was intended as my birding specs. The frames were half the price of the others, as I expect you can tell. ;) Neither true ER nor available ER would be any help in this case. David [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
New Allbinos Review of Monarch HG 10x42
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top