What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
New binocular dilemma
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brocknroller" data-source="post: 1864228" data-attributes="member: 665"><p><strong>3-D Effect in Bins of Different Configurations, Different Types</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Henry,</p><p></p><p>You're correct about the Fuji. The 8.5x42 EL measures 122 mm wide open all the way vs. the Fuji's 123 mm at 65mm IPD. At 65mm IPD, the EL would would be narrower than the little Fuji. But that doesn't explain the differences in 3-D effect since the ZR 7x36 is narrower still yet gives a very nice 3-D effect. </p><p></p><p>Yes, I know there is no difference in DOF among binoculars of the same magnification, in fact, I have it printed on my forehead backwards. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Let me rephrase my query: Why does the Fuji 6x30 and CJZ 8x50, which are different configurations, and the ZR 7x36, which is a configuration in between the two, but a <em>roof</em> bin, all give a very nice 3-D views? </p><p></p><p>It's not the DOF I'm referring to, per se, but rather I was wondering in there was a connection btwn good DOF and the <em>perception</em> of 3-D experience????</p><p></p><p>The bins mentioned in the post (10x42 SV EL) as well as the one's I mentioned (6x30 Fuji, 8x50 Octarem, 10x42 SLC, which are different configurations, have different DOF, and are even different bin types (porros vs. roofs), but all share a similar quality, that is, they all give the impression of having very good 3-D views. </p><p></p><p>When I'm looking at a landscape with the ZR 7x36 the separation between objects being viewed is more apparent, which allows me to better estimate distance. </p><p></p><p>With the 8x30 SLC or 8x32 LX, the views are compressed, that is, the same objects seem closer to together. The Celestron 8x42 Regal LX, which is a full sized bin, has a better 3-D effect than the SLC and LX, but not as good as the 7x36 ED2. </p><p></p><p>Is there an <em>optical</em> explanation for these perceptual differences?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brocknroller, post: 1864228, member: 665"] [b]3-D Effect in Bins of Different Configurations, Different Types[/b] Henry, You're correct about the Fuji. The 8.5x42 EL measures 122 mm wide open all the way vs. the Fuji's 123 mm at 65mm IPD. At 65mm IPD, the EL would would be narrower than the little Fuji. But that doesn't explain the differences in 3-D effect since the ZR 7x36 is narrower still yet gives a very nice 3-D effect. Yes, I know there is no difference in DOF among binoculars of the same magnification, in fact, I have it printed on my forehead backwards. :-) Let me rephrase my query: Why does the Fuji 6x30 and CJZ 8x50, which are different configurations, and the ZR 7x36, which is a configuration in between the two, but a [I]roof[/I] bin, all give a very nice 3-D views? It's not the DOF I'm referring to, per se, but rather I was wondering in there was a connection btwn good DOF and the [I]perception[/I] of 3-D experience???? The bins mentioned in the post (10x42 SV EL) as well as the one's I mentioned (6x30 Fuji, 8x50 Octarem, 10x42 SLC, which are different configurations, have different DOF, and are even different bin types (porros vs. roofs), but all share a similar quality, that is, they all give the impression of having very good 3-D views. When I'm looking at a landscape with the ZR 7x36 the separation between objects being viewed is more apparent, which allows me to better estimate distance. With the 8x30 SLC or 8x32 LX, the views are compressed, that is, the same objects seem closer to together. The Celestron 8x42 Regal LX, which is a full sized bin, has a better 3-D effect than the SLC and LX, but not as good as the 7x36 ED2. Is there an [I]optical[/I] explanation for these perceptual differences? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
New binocular dilemma
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top