What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
New binocular dilemma
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Surveyor" data-source="post: 1864266" data-attributes="member: 50720"><p>Brock,</p><p></p><p>I will make a guess or two about your 3D perception.</p><p></p><p>The one not usually associated with the general view but, at least for me, affects both the sweet spot and 3D, is collimation. If you look at a point about 30 m away and have a 64 mm IPD, that is a convergence angle of about 7.5’. The best I remember, the measured collimation on your 7x36 ED2 was 17’ divergent in object space (about 28% of allowable in the high performance range) or about 2.5’ convergent towards the objectives. That would make the total convergence (eye line) approx. 10’, or about 30-35% greater than your naked eyes. I have read somewhere that some binocular entities will collimate this way for the enhanced effect but I personally think it detracts from the sweet spot and resolution. As you mentioned, when you increase convergence, you will increase 3D effect. Of course the opposite also occurs.</p><p></p><p>Of course, you will always have all the other factors that affect perceptions, like curvature, astigmatism, etc.</p><p></p><p>Best</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Surveyor, post: 1864266, member: 50720"] Brock, I will make a guess or two about your 3D perception. The one not usually associated with the general view but, at least for me, affects both the sweet spot and 3D, is collimation. If you look at a point about 30 m away and have a 64 mm IPD, that is a convergence angle of about 7.5’. The best I remember, the measured collimation on your 7x36 ED2 was 17’ divergent in object space (about 28% of allowable in the high performance range) or about 2.5’ convergent towards the objectives. That would make the total convergence (eye line) approx. 10’, or about 30-35% greater than your naked eyes. I have read somewhere that some binocular entities will collimate this way for the enhanced effect but I personally think it detracts from the sweet spot and resolution. As you mentioned, when you increase convergence, you will increase 3D effect. Of course the opposite also occurs. Of course, you will always have all the other factors that affect perceptions, like curvature, astigmatism, etc. Best [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
New binocular dilemma
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top