What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
New Capito barbet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Richard Klim" data-source="post: 1797651" data-attributes="member: 773"><p><strong>Scytalopus</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p>Alan, I was 99% sure that would be precisely your reaction! But surely we need to use all available evidence to find out everything we can about the evolution, uniqueness and relationships of indvidual taxa, using as many methods as possible to verify our understanding. You imply that there's no justification for anyone seeking to learn about internal structures, apparently dismissing anatomical studies as an unnecessary irrelevance if they add nothing of immediate interest for the recreational birding community. Biological science isn't just about refining species limits for the benefit of world-listers. </p><p></p><p>Richard</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Richard Klim, post: 1797651, member: 773"] [b]Scytalopus[/b] Alan, I was 99% sure that would be precisely your reaction! But surely we need to use all available evidence to find out everything we can about the evolution, uniqueness and relationships of indvidual taxa, using as many methods as possible to verify our understanding. You imply that there's no justification for anyone seeking to learn about internal structures, apparently dismissing anatomical studies as an unnecessary irrelevance if they add nothing of immediate interest for the recreational birding community. Biological science isn't just about refining species limits for the benefit of world-listers. Richard [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
New Capito barbet
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top
