What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
New Capito barbet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snapdragyn" data-source="post: 2193978" data-attributes="member: 53867"><p>I think the idea that nothing is gained from knowledge of a new species other than pleasure in the knowledge is misguided & extremely shortsighted. The knowledge guides real world conservation decisions, which can ultimately determine the survival or exctinction of that species. You mention keeping the existance of undescribed species secret; I certainly hope that no species goes extinct because no one knew there was a species in an area planned for development that needed protection!</p><p></p><p>The idea that we should protect every individual is nice - but not very realistic. Conservation dollars are limited - I wish they weren't, of course, but I can recognize that they are & strive to work with that reality. That means that spending must be prioritized. Should those dollars go to preserving an area with hundreds of individuals of several widespread & common species, or to an area with a small but viable population of an endangered species? I'd vote for the latter. Now what if one of those 'widespread & common species' turned out to contain a separate, previously unrecognized species - that could change the conservation priorities.</p><p></p><p>Responsible specimen collection can allow such discoveries to happen - & I support that as someone who is mostly vegetarian (I do eat some fish, but w/ care as to which - no tuna) & petitioned out of courses in college that would have required vivisection or collecting insects.</p><p></p><p>A question: if you believe that respect of individuals is so important, what then of mass poisoning of invasive species on islands? Should we let entire species of seabirds go extinct rather than kill the rats, mice, cats, rabbits, or other exotic individuals who are destroying them?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snapdragyn, post: 2193978, member: 53867"] I think the idea that nothing is gained from knowledge of a new species other than pleasure in the knowledge is misguided & extremely shortsighted. The knowledge guides real world conservation decisions, which can ultimately determine the survival or exctinction of that species. You mention keeping the existance of undescribed species secret; I certainly hope that no species goes extinct because no one knew there was a species in an area planned for development that needed protection! The idea that we should protect every individual is nice - but not very realistic. Conservation dollars are limited - I wish they weren't, of course, but I can recognize that they are & strive to work with that reality. That means that spending must be prioritized. Should those dollars go to preserving an area with hundreds of individuals of several widespread & common species, or to an area with a small but viable population of an endangered species? I'd vote for the latter. Now what if one of those 'widespread & common species' turned out to contain a separate, previously unrecognized species - that could change the conservation priorities. Responsible specimen collection can allow such discoveries to happen - & I support that as someone who is mostly vegetarian (I do eat some fish, but w/ care as to which - no tuna) & petitioned out of courses in college that would have required vivisection or collecting insects. A question: if you believe that respect of individuals is so important, what then of mass poisoning of invasive species on islands? Should we let entire species of seabirds go extinct rather than kill the rats, mice, cats, rabbits, or other exotic individuals who are destroying them? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
New Capito barbet
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top