• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

New Product Introduction Today From Swarovski ? (2 Viewers)

If you can look through bins with 70°, sharp to the edge, and 91%, you will not discuss about the design :king:
 
And they are happy with a 91% transmission?!?
Seriously?
To me, they are such cheap looking ugly Binos...
The 'lowish' transmission figure is likely due to the amount of glass required to achieve those large AFov's.

Also Swarovski's never feel 'cheap' in the hand - for that you'll have to grab a Zeiss SF ....... :smoke:






Chosun :gh:
 
New Product: Swarovski NL Pure 8x42/10x42/12x43

sorry for the typo in the title: it should be 12x42

Model: 8x42 10x42 12x42
FoV: 159, 136, and 113m / 1000m
Transmission > 91%
Weight > 800g
Price > 2800 Euros

Launch Date: July 1, 2020
 

Attachments

  • nl_183.jpg
    nl_183.jpg
    107.1 KB · Views: 211
  • 132788.jpg
    132788.jpg
    24.8 KB · Views: 132
  • 132790.jpg
    132790.jpg
    25 KB · Views: 91
  • 132791.jpg
    132791.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 89
  • 198407fa16423b5616f7cf82b3b81a93.jpg
    198407fa16423b5616f7cf82b3b81a93.jpg
    8.2 KB · Views: 83
Last edited:
So they dropped the 8.5x for an 8x? It doesn't sound like much of a difference but after ten years of use I really have enjoyed the little extra oomph.

Maybe a 10x is in the offing. They do look comfy, with lots of room for fat fingers, lol.
 
So what actually is the product that is being offered..? Not sure I can follow this correctly and when does it hit the market..?

The Swarovski NL Pure binoculars 8x42, 10x42 and 12x42.
Available from September 1, 2020 with prices staring from 2850 Euro.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top