What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
New Swarovision EL v Old EL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="captain vallo" data-source="post: 1847196" data-attributes="member: 12753"><p>I guess Richard, you have already made the purchase of the new EL's, but here's just one more view in case anyone else is interested. As detail is well covered elsewhere, I will try and produce high level arguments as to the case for the new EL's.</p><p></p><p>I had until this week a pair of 4 year old Swaro EL 10 x 42 and Zeiss FL 8x32 - Both great bins, but despite the high cost, neither perfect by any standards.</p><p></p><p>I have just sold both and replaced with new EL 10 x 42 and Bushnell Elite 8.5 x 42 (discounting on discontinued version that could not be avoided)</p><p></p><p>As most here seem to realise, as with all things there is a case of:</p><p>1. Ever diminishing returns and </p><p>2. With current technology it appears impossible to get a 'true' magnified image and </p><p>3. You cant please all the people all the time.</p><p></p><p>All that being said, the new EL's have broken the first rule by providing such a significant improvement of image against its predecessor and dare I say over all the competition. Its also a considerable improvement in design/ergonomics (improved eye relief, FOV size, , etc), though I accept some may have preferred the old EL ergonomic design (size, barrel diameter etc).</p><p></p><p>OK, so point 2 still stands due to the so called rolling ball effect, but give me that any day over, blurry edges (point 3)</p><p></p><p>For me they have improved the ergonomics vastly, though I was worried about the number of turns required to focus, but it actually 'turns' out to be just right.</p><p></p><p>Throw all this into the pot and add actual cost of ownership and then the upgrade becomes one of 'what are you waiting for? (I sold my EL's for about the same as I paid for them 4 years ago, how's that for an investment). I know the Elites will be worth bugger all in 5 years (but as they are only my glovebox back up pair, I dont worry so much as I did with Zeiss), but there's a chance that the Swaros will still fetch a commanding price.</p><p></p><p>For the record, I guess point 3 will never ever be overcome by anyone .... Lets face it, we can't even make up an imaginary god that everyone agrees on!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="captain vallo, post: 1847196, member: 12753"] I guess Richard, you have already made the purchase of the new EL's, but here's just one more view in case anyone else is interested. As detail is well covered elsewhere, I will try and produce high level arguments as to the case for the new EL's. I had until this week a pair of 4 year old Swaro EL 10 x 42 and Zeiss FL 8x32 - Both great bins, but despite the high cost, neither perfect by any standards. I have just sold both and replaced with new EL 10 x 42 and Bushnell Elite 8.5 x 42 (discounting on discontinued version that could not be avoided) As most here seem to realise, as with all things there is a case of: 1. Ever diminishing returns and 2. With current technology it appears impossible to get a 'true' magnified image and 3. You cant please all the people all the time. All that being said, the new EL's have broken the first rule by providing such a significant improvement of image against its predecessor and dare I say over all the competition. Its also a considerable improvement in design/ergonomics (improved eye relief, FOV size, , etc), though I accept some may have preferred the old EL ergonomic design (size, barrel diameter etc). OK, so point 2 still stands due to the so called rolling ball effect, but give me that any day over, blurry edges (point 3) For me they have improved the ergonomics vastly, though I was worried about the number of turns required to focus, but it actually 'turns' out to be just right. Throw all this into the pot and add actual cost of ownership and then the upgrade becomes one of 'what are you waiting for? (I sold my EL's for about the same as I paid for them 4 years ago, how's that for an investment). I know the Elites will be worth bugger all in 5 years (but as they are only my glovebox back up pair, I dont worry so much as I did with Zeiss), but there's a chance that the Swaros will still fetch a commanding price. For the record, I guess point 3 will never ever be overcome by anyone .... Lets face it, we can't even make up an imaginary god that everyone agrees on! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
New Swarovision EL v Old EL
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top