What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
New Swarovski EL?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brocknroller" data-source="post: 1534393" data-attributes="member: 665"><p>Ron,</p><p></p><p>The difference between the early Leica BA owner's perception of CA on the other thread and yours may have to do with different levels of sensitivity to CA.</p><p></p><p>Also, sensitivity to CA seems to change as people get older and their eye lenses becomes yellow (and harder). </p><p></p><p>I'm not sure if this is why your BA's are starting to get on your nerves when before you sang their praises or if after trying bins with ED or FL glass, you realized what you were missing? </p><p></p><p>Also, I read that at some point Leica changed over to lead-free glass in their BA series without announcing it (and to the best of my knowledge no-one has been able to pin down the serial # or year when this happened). </p><p></p><p>So even though your a BA is an "early" sample, it's possible that it has lead-free glass since no-one knows exactly when the changeover occurred. </p><p></p><p>I'm not sure if there's a way to test this objectively (without melting down the lenses <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />. </p><p></p><p>I noticed that I'm more sensitive to CA in the winter since there tends to be higher contrast backgrounds with the gray skies and snow. </p><p></p><p>In the winter, my LX starts to "get on my nerves" but in the spring, summer, and early fall, I rarely notice the CA. </p><p></p><p>Also, after comparing the Promaster ED to my LX, I became more sensitive to the CA in the LX. </p><p></p><p>I also have porros, which I sometimes take out with me at the same time as the LX, and when I switch back and forth I can notice the difference in CA if I'm looking at birds against a high contrast background. </p><p></p><p>So I stopped taking the porros out with me when I'm using the LX, and this has changed my perception since I no longer "look for it" though I'm sure it's there. </p><p></p><p>If you can afford it, I would recommend that you hang on to your Leica until you have thoroughly tested and used your FL for a while. </p><p></p><p>Despite the FL glass, the Zeiss might not appeal to you for other reasons, and you might find yourself wishing you hadn't sold the BA! Hopefully not. </p><p></p><p>Brock</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brocknroller, post: 1534393, member: 665"] Ron, The difference between the early Leica BA owner's perception of CA on the other thread and yours may have to do with different levels of sensitivity to CA. Also, sensitivity to CA seems to change as people get older and their eye lenses becomes yellow (and harder). I'm not sure if this is why your BA's are starting to get on your nerves when before you sang their praises or if after trying bins with ED or FL glass, you realized what you were missing? Also, I read that at some point Leica changed over to lead-free glass in their BA series without announcing it (and to the best of my knowledge no-one has been able to pin down the serial # or year when this happened). So even though your a BA is an "early" sample, it's possible that it has lead-free glass since no-one knows exactly when the changeover occurred. I'm not sure if there's a way to test this objectively (without melting down the lenses :-). I noticed that I'm more sensitive to CA in the winter since there tends to be higher contrast backgrounds with the gray skies and snow. In the winter, my LX starts to "get on my nerves" but in the spring, summer, and early fall, I rarely notice the CA. Also, after comparing the Promaster ED to my LX, I became more sensitive to the CA in the LX. I also have porros, which I sometimes take out with me at the same time as the LX, and when I switch back and forth I can notice the difference in CA if I'm looking at birds against a high contrast background. So I stopped taking the porros out with me when I'm using the LX, and this has changed my perception since I no longer "look for it" though I'm sure it's there. If you can afford it, I would recommend that you hang on to your Leica until you have thoroughly tested and used your FL for a while. Despite the FL glass, the Zeiss might not appeal to you for other reasons, and you might find yourself wishing you hadn't sold the BA! Hopefully not. Brock [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
New Swarovski EL?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top