What is odd is that Zeiss announced in the press release back in
May, the body of the new Victory SF is made of metal.
The fiberglass construction from the retailers site is interesting.
Both sources say 780 grams, and so they maybe could not reach
that low of weight with metal.
Jerry
So, after 700+ posts, has anyone actually used the new Zeiss SF? The more I read from other sources the more interested I am.
From an aesthetics point of view, the use of plastic in the SF body would be a deal killer for me. :-C
Especially, after Zeiss already announced they would be made of magnesium.
Yes, fiberglass is tough and lightweight but it's not what I want my $2,700.00 binocular to be made of !!! |<|
I have a feeling the information posted on the BH site is a mistake and hope that's the case.
Fellows, At NDHunter's invitation....magnesium.
I will have an 8x and a 10 at the Tucson Adudubon Event this week.
Keep Well,
Rich
From an aesthetics point of view, the use of plastic in the SF body would be a deal killer for me. :-C
Especially, after Zeiss already announced they would be made of magnesium.
Yes, fiberglass is tough and lightweight but it's not what I want my $2,700.00 binocular to be made of !!! |<|
I have a feeling the information posted on the BH site is a mistake and hope that's the case.
... If a "carbon fiber reinforced plastic" chassis /body was made (with or without some form of magnesium, or titanium honeycomb /mesh reinforcing) that was lighter, stronger AND cheaper, then all the other goodies like hollow titanium shafts etc could be included, and still be brought in below Swarovski SLC cost, especially with a 'normal' fast focusing system ..... :t:
From a wallet point of view $2700 may be a deal killer too! |8.|
I understand the point that fiberglass /plastic is not commensurate with the exhorbitant price tag ...... but in a way that's the point too! :cat:
If a "carbon fiber reinforced plastic" chassis /body was made (with or without some form of magnesium, or titanium honeycomb /mesh reinforcing) that was lighter, stronger AND cheaper, then all the other goodies like hollow titanium shafts etc could be included, and still be brought in below Swarovski SLC cost, especially with a 'normal' fast focusing system.
I don't think you'll have to worry though - it looks like that BH info was just a retailer site error?
Hope that plenty of our Arizonite and nearby buddies can get to hands-on at Tuscon and give us a report back on their impressions and all the SF stuff we've been discussing to fill the void in the meantime ..... :t:
Chosun :gh:
Using "magnesium" (or magnesium alloy really) is probably the easiest way to go.
And not exotic in any way.
Carbon fiber/reinforced polymer would probably be more expensive due to more complicated manufacturing?
How much polymer is it in the construction and where is it?
http://www.cloudynights.com/ubbthreads/attachments/1848824-Zeiss Victory FL spaccato 1.jpg
......
I will have an 8x and a 10 at the Tucson Adudubon Event this week.
Keep Well,
Rich
From a wallet point of view $2700 may be a deal killer too! |8.|
........................
Hope that plenty of our Arizonite and nearby buddies can get to hands-on at Tuscon and give us a report back on their impressions............ :t:
Chosun :gh: