What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Newbie suffering paralysis by analysis.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iveljay" data-source="post: 3258836" data-attributes="member: 37260"><p>The more expensive Olympus EXPSI (than the DPSI) 8x42 binoculars are part of their 'Profesional' range (properly coated with decent prisms, but still not waterproof (Amazon is wrong)) and are built to a far higher standard than the DPSIs which are classified as part of their 'Leisure' range, which apart from the odd startling exception (8x25 PCI reverse porro, which is brilliant (the similarly named 8x21 DPCI is not in the same class)) are a bit (in my view) dissapointing and not worth considering for our requirements. The EXPSI 8x42 is slightly big for very small hands but may be bought at the current time for around £99 from at least one London stockist, subject to stock availability - optically they are quite good. Do not confuse with the EXWPI range, which are roofs and cost more.</p><p></p><p>Avoid all zooms in low price hand held binoculars- it can't be stressed too much.</p><p></p><p>The Nikon Aculon is a bit too new for me, however Nikon produce sensibly designed binoculars that tend to work well. The only reason I am not a fan is that I own an Action EX 10x50 (it cost me £85 brand new in a sale) where the retractable eye-cups are too wide in diameter for my deeply set eyes, however since I rarely need to use them it seems silly to replace them.</p><p></p><p>The Nikon Aculon is 25 grams lighter than the Olympus EXPSI and is probably a good buy.</p><p></p><p>The waterproof RSPB porros are excellent build and both the examples I have owned have been good optically. However they both had stiff focussing compared to say the non-waterproof Olympuses. They are quite compact compared to the Olympus and easy to hold and if they are in good condition (and you can live with the slightly tight focussing) wont dissapoint. I still own one, the other proved that accidentally throwing them on to a marble floor is a bad thing to do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iveljay, post: 3258836, member: 37260"] The more expensive Olympus EXPSI (than the DPSI) 8x42 binoculars are part of their 'Profesional' range (properly coated with decent prisms, but still not waterproof (Amazon is wrong)) and are built to a far higher standard than the DPSIs which are classified as part of their 'Leisure' range, which apart from the odd startling exception (8x25 PCI reverse porro, which is brilliant (the similarly named 8x21 DPCI is not in the same class)) are a bit (in my view) dissapointing and not worth considering for our requirements. The EXPSI 8x42 is slightly big for very small hands but may be bought at the current time for around £99 from at least one London stockist, subject to stock availability - optically they are quite good. Do not confuse with the EXWPI range, which are roofs and cost more. Avoid all zooms in low price hand held binoculars- it can't be stressed too much. The Nikon Aculon is a bit too new for me, however Nikon produce sensibly designed binoculars that tend to work well. The only reason I am not a fan is that I own an Action EX 10x50 (it cost me £85 brand new in a sale) where the retractable eye-cups are too wide in diameter for my deeply set eyes, however since I rarely need to use them it seems silly to replace them. The Nikon Aculon is 25 grams lighter than the Olympus EXPSI and is probably a good buy. The waterproof RSPB porros are excellent build and both the examples I have owned have been good optically. However they both had stiff focussing compared to say the non-waterproof Olympuses. They are quite compact compared to the Olympus and easy to hold and if they are in good condition (and you can live with the slightly tight focussing) wont dissapoint. I still own one, the other proved that accidentally throwing them on to a marble floor is a bad thing to do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Newbie suffering paralysis by analysis.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top