What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Newbie with 8x32 HG and SE
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kabsetz" data-source="post: 266022" data-attributes="member: 10167"><p>I liked Henry's explanation about the image scale illusion between porros and roofs. When I was testing 10x binoculars, I was bothered enough by the apparent magnification difference between the Zeiss FL and Nikon SE that I went and did a comparative magnification measurement with them to determine whether the SE really had less magnification. The result was that it actually had slightly more, by about 2.2 percent. I measured this by viewing a ruler set at ten meters (target to objective lens) with both binoculars fixed with a 3x booster, and by measuring the total field width in millimeters visible through the booster.</p><p></p><p>To test Henry's explanation, one could probably devise a test setup where one would use a simple two-mirror periscope for one eye to widen one's naked eye interpupillary distance and see whether this makes objects look smaller compared to the immediate reference of viewing the same objects without the periscope. If anyone is inspired to try this, please post the results.</p><p></p><p>Kimmo</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kabsetz, post: 266022, member: 10167"] I liked Henry's explanation about the image scale illusion between porros and roofs. When I was testing 10x binoculars, I was bothered enough by the apparent magnification difference between the Zeiss FL and Nikon SE that I went and did a comparative magnification measurement with them to determine whether the SE really had less magnification. The result was that it actually had slightly more, by about 2.2 percent. I measured this by viewing a ruler set at ten meters (target to objective lens) with both binoculars fixed with a 3x booster, and by measuring the total field width in millimeters visible through the booster. To test Henry's explanation, one could probably devise a test setup where one would use a simple two-mirror periscope for one eye to widen one's naked eye interpupillary distance and see whether this makes objects look smaller compared to the immediate reference of viewing the same objects without the periscope. If anyone is inspired to try this, please post the results. Kimmo [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Newbie with 8x32 HG and SE
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top