What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
News from Leica
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AGPank" data-source="post: 3345746" data-attributes="member: 135404"><p>I had e razor 10x42 and have the Tinovid (non-HD). I didn't look at them side by side, but from notes on my other reviews. The razor does have a big field of view, is light weight, and is bright. I really didn't like the ergonomics, mainly oddly placed thumb detents. I think the razor needs to work on overall build quality. Rain guards and objective covers felt cheap and had to replace them within a year. The emblem on the focus mechanism fell off and I had to reglue, and paint easily chipped off the body. The eyepieces felt too thin for me too. Vortex has a better reputation for warranty. I was disappointed with CA control for a HD optic. </p><p></p><p>I feel like the build quality is much better on Trinovid. I really like the natural color rendition of the Trinovid. The weight difference is negligible to me and the Trinovid holds better for me and had better ergonomics for me. I think Leica holds value better than Vortex. </p><p></p><p>I feel like the Razor is good,but is over priced.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AGPank, post: 3345746, member: 135404"] I had e razor 10x42 and have the Tinovid (non-HD). I didn't look at them side by side, but from notes on my other reviews. The razor does have a big field of view, is light weight, and is bright. I really didn't like the ergonomics, mainly oddly placed thumb detents. I think the razor needs to work on overall build quality. Rain guards and objective covers felt cheap and had to replace them within a year. The emblem on the focus mechanism fell off and I had to reglue, and paint easily chipped off the body. The eyepieces felt too thin for me too. Vortex has a better reputation for warranty. I was disappointed with CA control for a HD optic. I feel like the build quality is much better on Trinovid. I really like the natural color rendition of the Trinovid. The weight difference is negligible to me and the Trinovid holds better for me and had better ergonomics for me. I think Leica holds value better than Vortex. I feel like the Razor is good,but is over priced. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
News from Leica
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top