What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Nikon 10x42 SE & Swift Audubon 820 8.5x44
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="edz" data-source="post: 1262363" data-attributes="member: 44073"><p>1st answer yes. Actually I just tested that today in three different optics. You hit an upper limit of power, and then there is no gain. In some instances the view gets worse. In my 80mm scope I saw exactly the same resolution limit at four powers from 125x to 175x. In several binoculars I could see no more resolution at 70x and in fact it in one it got worse at 80x.</p><p></p><p>2nd, perhaps yes. generally a lower acuity can see the same object when a higher power is applied.</p><p></p><p>3rd, yes, but only in that scenario. if they both use one of the same binocular and get very different results for power to reach the limit, then that would clearly be showing the difference in acuity between the two observers. But, that is just one scenario. </p><p></p><p>Suppose there is only one observer and we follow thru #1. And let's also suppose the observer has two binoculars, same size, but different quality. At same power limit they show very different res results. That's a completely different scenario than anything you mentioned, and it's not measuring acuity. </p><p></p><p>Or suppose two observers have the same acuity and compare two different quality binoculars and get different results. What then? Certainly not acuity.</p><p></p><p>a fourth scenario. ONE observer uses two different brands binoculars, but both same size, and both used at numerous powers. For sake of discussion they both do very well, they both see 3". But the first one can see 3" at both 60x and 65x and shows no further increase. the second one does not see 3" until you reach 70x. beyond 70x, there is no further increase and it is fuzzy. This is not a test of acuity. The first binocular reaches the resolution limit at a lower power, has a lower apparent res and is better. </p><p></p><p>these examples provided specifically to show in these scenarios, beyond your example, it is not testing acuity.</p><p></p><p>edz</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="edz, post: 1262363, member: 44073"] 1st answer yes. Actually I just tested that today in three different optics. You hit an upper limit of power, and then there is no gain. In some instances the view gets worse. In my 80mm scope I saw exactly the same resolution limit at four powers from 125x to 175x. In several binoculars I could see no more resolution at 70x and in fact it in one it got worse at 80x. 2nd, perhaps yes. generally a lower acuity can see the same object when a higher power is applied. 3rd, yes, but only in that scenario. if they both use one of the same binocular and get very different results for power to reach the limit, then that would clearly be showing the difference in acuity between the two observers. But, that is just one scenario. Suppose there is only one observer and we follow thru #1. And let's also suppose the observer has two binoculars, same size, but different quality. At same power limit they show very different res results. That's a completely different scenario than anything you mentioned, and it's not measuring acuity. Or suppose two observers have the same acuity and compare two different quality binoculars and get different results. What then? Certainly not acuity. a fourth scenario. ONE observer uses two different brands binoculars, but both same size, and both used at numerous powers. For sake of discussion they both do very well, they both see 3". But the first one can see 3" at both 60x and 65x and shows no further increase. the second one does not see 3" until you reach 70x. beyond 70x, there is no further increase and it is fuzzy. This is not a test of acuity. The first binocular reaches the resolution limit at a lower power, has a lower apparent res and is better. these examples provided specifically to show in these scenarios, beyond your example, it is not testing acuity. edz [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Nikon 10x42 SE & Swift Audubon 820 8.5x44
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top