What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Nikon 10x42 SE & Swift Audubon 820 8.5x44
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="edz" data-source="post: 1263031" data-attributes="member: 44073"><p>The resolution we see thru any optic is always apparent. You may see 3" of resolution magnified 40x, or 50x or 60x. The object seen in the view is seen at a size of 120 arccseconds apparent, 150 arcseconds apparent or 180 arcseconds apparent. It has always been that. You've just may not have ever heard anyone refer to it that way. In telescope optics it is a common reference. There are few people dealing in binocular optics, perhaps 5% or less, that are performing and providing test results for resolution. That would mean at least 95% of the people are not using the term unless one of those 5% uses it first.</p><p></p><p>The concept of raising an object to an apparent size large enough to see is the basis of what it takes to see an object at low contrast resolution. A 3 arcsecond sized object never changes size from 3 arcsec. Depending on the condition, it must be raised to some apparent size to see it. When that object happens to be a double star with 1 arcsec separation you may need to raise it by 200x, (or in this case a 3" set of line pars by 60x), in both cases to an apparrent resolution of ~200 arcseconds before you can see it. It is no different here. There are not two different sets of rules for different uses of optics. The rules and terms are the same. Employing a fine apochromatic triplet to observe that same target may allow you to see it at an apparent resolution of 160-180 arcseconds. Finer optics, better results. </p><p></p><p>Yes, the lowest reading that gives the maximum result shows the best apparent resolution and is indicative of the better optic. Simple maximum raw resolution does not tell the whole story, as I hope is well explained in all my posts above.</p><p></p><p>edz</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="edz, post: 1263031, member: 44073"] The resolution we see thru any optic is always apparent. You may see 3" of resolution magnified 40x, or 50x or 60x. The object seen in the view is seen at a size of 120 arccseconds apparent, 150 arcseconds apparent or 180 arcseconds apparent. It has always been that. You've just may not have ever heard anyone refer to it that way. In telescope optics it is a common reference. There are few people dealing in binocular optics, perhaps 5% or less, that are performing and providing test results for resolution. That would mean at least 95% of the people are not using the term unless one of those 5% uses it first. The concept of raising an object to an apparent size large enough to see is the basis of what it takes to see an object at low contrast resolution. A 3 arcsecond sized object never changes size from 3 arcsec. Depending on the condition, it must be raised to some apparent size to see it. When that object happens to be a double star with 1 arcsec separation you may need to raise it by 200x, (or in this case a 3" set of line pars by 60x), in both cases to an apparrent resolution of ~200 arcseconds before you can see it. It is no different here. There are not two different sets of rules for different uses of optics. The rules and terms are the same. Employing a fine apochromatic triplet to observe that same target may allow you to see it at an apparent resolution of 160-180 arcseconds. Finer optics, better results. Yes, the lowest reading that gives the maximum result shows the best apparent resolution and is indicative of the better optic. Simple maximum raw resolution does not tell the whole story, as I hope is well explained in all my posts above. edz [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Nikon 10x42 SE & Swift Audubon 820 8.5x44
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top