What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon 300mm f4+1.7TC vs Sigma 150-500
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="swainsons" data-source="post: 1786768" data-attributes="member: 82915"><p>Mmmm. maybe my Sigma was a very sour lemon then. The difference between my 300mmf4 and Sigma is vast to say the least.</p><p></p><p>What I find interesting is that the 300mmf4 lens is really easy to use, even without VR I have no problems. With the Sigma I always had a little fight going, making sure everything is this or that way, my keeper rate with Sigma was probably around 5/100. With Nikon lens its more like 20/100. Thats a big difference.</p><p></p><p>Maybe the D90 vs D60 body is also making a big difference. Not sure.</p><p></p><p>See attached moon picture from the other night, I could never get that right with my Sigma....</p><p></p><p>Regards,</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="swainsons, post: 1786768, member: 82915"] Mmmm. maybe my Sigma was a very sour lemon then. The difference between my 300mmf4 and Sigma is vast to say the least. What I find interesting is that the 300mmf4 lens is really easy to use, even without VR I have no problems. With the Sigma I always had a little fight going, making sure everything is this or that way, my keeper rate with Sigma was probably around 5/100. With Nikon lens its more like 20/100. Thats a big difference. Maybe the D90 vs D60 body is also making a big difference. Not sure. See attached moon picture from the other night, I could never get that right with my Sigma.... Regards, [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon 300mm f4+1.7TC vs Sigma 150-500
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top