What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 vs. 300mm f4??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RJM" data-source="post: 1674585" data-attributes="member: 66340"><p>All the currrent AF-S Nikon lenses are plenty sharp and fast focusing for a DX body. If you don't have any lenses at all and a US$2k budget, I suggest the Nikon AF-S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 VR and Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED. Both are very sweet on the D300 and may be all you need for superb panoramas and nature portraits. All for the same price as the 300mm F4 too!</p><p> </p><p>Throw in the new AF-S 35mm F1.8 for low/natural light shots inside/around your lodge. Still leaves you with a few Benjamins left over compared to the cost of the 70-200 F2.8! </p><p> </p><p>For the long shots of wolves and bears you might want to consider using a Nikon ED fieldscope with dSLR adapter. This will get you to 1500mm+, far more each than you will ever have with a $10k 600mm F4!</p><p> </p><p>happy holidays,</p><p>Rick</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RJM, post: 1674585, member: 66340"] All the currrent AF-S Nikon lenses are plenty sharp and fast focusing for a DX body. If you don't have any lenses at all and a US$2k budget, I suggest the Nikon AF-S 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 VR and Nikon 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED. Both are very sweet on the D300 and may be all you need for superb panoramas and nature portraits. All for the same price as the 300mm F4 too! Throw in the new AF-S 35mm F1.8 for low/natural light shots inside/around your lodge. Still leaves you with a few Benjamins left over compared to the cost of the 70-200 F2.8! For the long shots of wolves and bears you might want to consider using a Nikon ED fieldscope with dSLR adapter. This will get you to 1500mm+, far more each than you will ever have with a $10k 600mm F4! happy holidays, Rick [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 vs. 300mm f4??
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top