What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 vs. 300mm f4??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Duke Leto" data-source="post: 1674621" data-attributes="member: 35693"><p>HI I have both lenses and both are excellent, in optical and build quality, the 70-200vr may be one of the best lenses on the market let alone from Nikon. The 300/4 is a nice walkabout lens and takes a 1.4tc with little loss. Its a hard call as both are so nice in there own right.</p><p>What lenses have you already? if its just a general use lens your looking for that will cover a few opportunities such the 80-400vr may be a better choice.</p><p>If I were going to stack one against the other I would say that the 70-200 is a faster and marginally sharper lens than the 300 and you could increase the focal length of the 70-200 with one of the range of TC's from Nikon</p><p></p><p>It really depends on what your subject is going to be</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Duke Leto, post: 1674621, member: 35693"] HI I have both lenses and both are excellent, in optical and build quality, the 70-200vr may be one of the best lenses on the market let alone from Nikon. The 300/4 is a nice walkabout lens and takes a 1.4tc with little loss. Its a hard call as both are so nice in there own right. What lenses have you already? if its just a general use lens your looking for that will cover a few opportunities such the 80-400vr may be a better choice. If I were going to stack one against the other I would say that the 70-200 is a faster and marginally sharper lens than the 300 and you could increase the focal length of the 70-200 with one of the range of TC's from Nikon It really depends on what your subject is going to be [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 vs. 300mm f4??
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top