What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 vs. 300mm f4??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RJM" data-source="post: 1675360" data-attributes="member: 66340"><p>That's strange as most bench tests of the 18-55mm VR show it to be one of Nikon's sharpest lenses and a great value. Same for the 70-300mm VR. Also, the D300 will automatically compensate for lens distortions and chromatic aberation, unlike your old D50, so sometimes lesser lenses get new lives. I know that was certainly the case with my 18-200 VR on the D90.</p><p> </p><p>Nikon is rumored to release several new lenses in Spring including a 100-500mm zoom so it may be prudent to wait and see since you have until Summer.</p><p> </p><p>Can't fault anyone for buying pro-level glass and the 70-200mm is known to be a pro workhorse lens for portraits and indoor sports. Certainly tempting too since with the release of the new VRII version the old lens is being dumped for a song, ~$1300 here in Japan.</p><p> </p><p>But for me, its size/weight is alot more than I want to lug around in outdoor nature while still having to shoot at F8 anyway to minimize its corner softness for stunning Yellowstone landscapes. Plus Nikon has fast/sharper primes within the 70-200mm focal range that are cheaper and are less of handful.</p><p> </p><p>cheers,</p><p>Rick</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RJM, post: 1675360, member: 66340"] That's strange as most bench tests of the 18-55mm VR show it to be one of Nikon's sharpest lenses and a great value. Same for the 70-300mm VR. Also, the D300 will automatically compensate for lens distortions and chromatic aberation, unlike your old D50, so sometimes lesser lenses get new lives. I know that was certainly the case with my 18-200 VR on the D90. Nikon is rumored to release several new lenses in Spring including a 100-500mm zoom so it may be prudent to wait and see since you have until Summer. Can't fault anyone for buying pro-level glass and the 70-200mm is known to be a pro workhorse lens for portraits and indoor sports. Certainly tempting too since with the release of the new VRII version the old lens is being dumped for a song, ~$1300 here in Japan. But for me, its size/weight is alot more than I want to lug around in outdoor nature while still having to shoot at F8 anyway to minimize its corner softness for stunning Yellowstone landscapes. Plus Nikon has fast/sharper primes within the 70-200mm focal range that are cheaper and are less of handful. cheers, Rick [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 vs. 300mm f4??
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top