What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 vs. 300mm f4??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RJM" data-source="post: 1676169" data-attributes="member: 66340"><p>I use the Sigma 150-500mm. It is a nice lens and quite sharp through most of the range, especially at F8 on a DX camera. The MTF curves for the lens show this to be true so any "softness" you see in posted pics is more likely due to operator error or using a FX body.</p><p> </p><p>Mechanically it is kinda "noisy" to the shooter but silent to those standing next to you. Handheld shots can be very nice depending on distance of course. It will sometime hunt for focus at telephoto (a limiter would have been nice) but you can grab the focus ring at any time to manually correct. </p><p> </p><p>You can also use it with a cellotape modified Sigma 1.4TC and still get Auto Focus but focus can be erratic and the lens will tend to overexpose by a full stop. Using the TC unmodified requires Manual focus (watch the focus indicator light in the viewfinder) but can produce more consistent results in sketchy light. </p><p> </p><p>I have a thread somewhere here in the last year on using it with the D90 if you search.</p><p> </p><p>cheers,</p><p>Rick</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RJM, post: 1676169, member: 66340"] I use the Sigma 150-500mm. It is a nice lens and quite sharp through most of the range, especially at F8 on a DX camera. The MTF curves for the lens show this to be true so any "softness" you see in posted pics is more likely due to operator error or using a FX body. Mechanically it is kinda "noisy" to the shooter but silent to those standing next to you. Handheld shots can be very nice depending on distance of course. It will sometime hunt for focus at telephoto (a limiter would have been nice) but you can grab the focus ring at any time to manually correct. You can also use it with a cellotape modified Sigma 1.4TC and still get Auto Focus but focus can be erratic and the lens will tend to overexpose by a full stop. Using the TC unmodified requires Manual focus (watch the focus indicator light in the viewfinder) but can produce more consistent results in sketchy light. I have a thread somewhere here in the last year on using it with the D90 if you search. cheers, Rick [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon 70-200mm f2.8 vs. 300mm f4??
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top