What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon centralizes optical engineering
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Troubador" data-source="post: 3547926" data-attributes="member: 109211"><p>Hi Pete</p><p></p><p>Your opinion about Nikon's efforts in the mid range is as valid as anyone's but if we asked on here for folks to say what is best in this price bracket you would probably get an answer that you could calculate with the following formula: number of members who reply X the number of brands on the market.</p><p></p><p>It is unclear exactly why you are focussing on the mid range but lets consider what you might be saying.</p><p></p><p>1 Nikon doesn't deserve respect unless it is the best in the mid range. Well this logic takes respect away from Zeiss and Leica as there are plenty of folks who will say Conquest and Trinovid are decent but they aren't the best in class. And equally you will find folks who point to Monarch HG and say 'beat that if you can'.</p><p></p><p>2 Nikon doesn't deserve respect unless they are the best in all ranges and you are just choosing the mid-range as an example. This logic takes respect off Swarovski too since many will say that while their CL is very nice it is easily beaten in its class. And lets be realistic, Nikon is in so many niches in the bino market, can any company be best in all categories?</p><p></p><p>3 Nikon has been the best in all categories in the past in binos and photo lenses and it has lost its way. Was Nikon ever best in all categories? Really? The SE and EII porros are revered still, and some will say EDG is the best of the best. So why pick on the middle range where some will say Monarch HG is about to upset both established brands and newcomers? And I don't believe for one moment that either Nikon or Canon have ever been best is every photo lens category at the same time.</p><p></p><p>I am not a Nikon fan-boy but if I wanted to pick half a dozen mid-range binos to take on bino-binge trip then I would certainly want Nikon in there. Not because they are necessarily the best (try getting an agreement about what that is! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />) but because they are there or thereabouts.</p><p></p><p>Lee</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Troubador, post: 3547926, member: 109211"] Hi Pete Your opinion about Nikon's efforts in the mid range is as valid as anyone's but if we asked on here for folks to say what is best in this price bracket you would probably get an answer that you could calculate with the following formula: number of members who reply X the number of brands on the market. It is unclear exactly why you are focussing on the mid range but lets consider what you might be saying. 1 Nikon doesn't deserve respect unless it is the best in the mid range. Well this logic takes respect away from Zeiss and Leica as there are plenty of folks who will say Conquest and Trinovid are decent but they aren't the best in class. And equally you will find folks who point to Monarch HG and say 'beat that if you can'. 2 Nikon doesn't deserve respect unless they are the best in all ranges and you are just choosing the mid-range as an example. This logic takes respect off Swarovski too since many will say that while their CL is very nice it is easily beaten in its class. And lets be realistic, Nikon is in so many niches in the bino market, can any company be best in all categories? 3 Nikon has been the best in all categories in the past in binos and photo lenses and it has lost its way. Was Nikon ever best in all categories? Really? The SE and EII porros are revered still, and some will say EDG is the best of the best. So why pick on the middle range where some will say Monarch HG is about to upset both established brands and newcomers? And I don't believe for one moment that either Nikon or Canon have ever been best is every photo lens category at the same time. I am not a Nikon fan-boy but if I wanted to pick half a dozen mid-range binos to take on bino-binge trip then I would certainly want Nikon in there. Not because they are necessarily the best (try getting an agreement about what that is! :-)) but because they are there or thereabouts. Lee [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon centralizes optical engineering
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top