What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon centralizes optical engineering
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Binastro" data-source="post: 3548472" data-attributes="member: 111403"><p>The problem with really fast large lenses is that many are not civilian and written details sometimes don't exist.</p><p>Sometimes even the maker's name is missing from the optics.</p><p>In fact some don't officially exist. So one has to actually see them.</p><p></p><p>I had to leave my camera at reception at one facility and was not allowed to take notes, although I was able to closely inspect some amazing lenses.</p><p></p><p>However, photos taken with some of them are classic and have been widely reproduced re. the space programme.</p><p></p><p>The Celestron 300mm f/1.5 Schmidt camera turns up sometimes and should have Epoch modifications.</p><p>I think that prices are reasonable.</p><p></p><p>See.</p><p>J. Dragesco JBAA 1994.</p><p>Celestron Schmidt cameras</p><p>15 lbs weight.</p><p>Hypered TP 2415 Film best.</p><p>Not sure if they can be used with digital sensors.</p><p></p><p>Regarding Nikon.</p><p>I would advise Nikon Aculons and Action VII binoculars as the first choice in low price binoculars.</p><p>Wide fields, very useful and only about one in ten seem to have alignment problems.</p><p>Similarly, other lower price Nikon binoculars in Europe are good choices, despite my disappointing 8x42 Monarch HG.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Binastro, post: 3548472, member: 111403"] The problem with really fast large lenses is that many are not civilian and written details sometimes don't exist. Sometimes even the maker's name is missing from the optics. In fact some don't officially exist. So one has to actually see them. I had to leave my camera at reception at one facility and was not allowed to take notes, although I was able to closely inspect some amazing lenses. However, photos taken with some of them are classic and have been widely reproduced re. the space programme. The Celestron 300mm f/1.5 Schmidt camera turns up sometimes and should have Epoch modifications. I think that prices are reasonable. See. J. Dragesco JBAA 1994. Celestron Schmidt cameras 15 lbs weight. Hypered TP 2415 Film best. Not sure if they can be used with digital sensors. Regarding Nikon. I would advise Nikon Aculons and Action VII binoculars as the first choice in low price binoculars. Wide fields, very useful and only about one in ten seem to have alignment problems. Similarly, other lower price Nikon binoculars in Europe are good choices, despite my disappointing 8x42 Monarch HG. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon centralizes optical engineering
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top