What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon centralizes optical engineering
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Binastro" data-source="post: 3549518" data-attributes="member: 111403"><p>Hi Maico.</p><p>The Celestron 300mm f/1.5 Schmidt camera is probably a lot cheaper than a Nikon 300mm f/2.</p><p>But it would need some kind of field flattener for a digital or a curved sensor. It maybe there are military curved sensors.</p><p></p><p>The complete 36inch f/4 Wray lens housing with lens looks like a huge dustbin. I got one for £10. The others up to £60. I gave them to people who might use them and were stronger than me. They were used I think on 9x9 inch film at full aperture for night photography. Perhaps late 1960s, maybe Prof. Wynne designed it.The resolution is rather poor but does the job. His Wray series 3 12 inch, 24 inch and 36 inch f/6.3 are really good. The earlier ones not so good.</p><p></p><p>Oldham Optical, Scarborough? say they will make you a 300mm f/1 Schmidt camera and up to 500mm f/1.</p><p>They say they have made 300mm f/1 mirrors. Probably cost a bit.</p><p></p><p>The 240mm f1.2 Zoomatar for 70mm format with a Minolta MD mount and a Minolta MAF to MD adaptor would make a Zoomatar 300mm f/1.5 lens as the MAF to MD adaptor has a 1.25x lens element in it. This would fit either MAF or Sony A cameras. But the lenses go for about $35,000 dollars.</p><p></p><p>I had numerous Kilfitt/Zoomar mount adapters for Alpa, Contarex, Minolta etc etc.</p><p></p><p>Nikon do make some very good value binoculars. I haven't got any Nikon Action Ex as I don't need waterproofing.</p><p>The 12x56 Nikon Roof prism I like, as I do the 12x56 Barr and Stroud.</p><p></p><p>25 degree C today. I had the air conditioner on.</p><p></p><p>P.S.</p><p>Not sure if some Schmidt cameras have flat fields at focus or if all are curved. Some do have special extra correcting optics.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Binastro, post: 3549518, member: 111403"] Hi Maico. The Celestron 300mm f/1.5 Schmidt camera is probably a lot cheaper than a Nikon 300mm f/2. But it would need some kind of field flattener for a digital or a curved sensor. It maybe there are military curved sensors. The complete 36inch f/4 Wray lens housing with lens looks like a huge dustbin. I got one for £10. The others up to £60. I gave them to people who might use them and were stronger than me. They were used I think on 9x9 inch film at full aperture for night photography. Perhaps late 1960s, maybe Prof. Wynne designed it.The resolution is rather poor but does the job. His Wray series 3 12 inch, 24 inch and 36 inch f/6.3 are really good. The earlier ones not so good. Oldham Optical, Scarborough? say they will make you a 300mm f/1 Schmidt camera and up to 500mm f/1. They say they have made 300mm f/1 mirrors. Probably cost a bit. The 240mm f1.2 Zoomatar for 70mm format with a Minolta MD mount and a Minolta MAF to MD adaptor would make a Zoomatar 300mm f/1.5 lens as the MAF to MD adaptor has a 1.25x lens element in it. This would fit either MAF or Sony A cameras. But the lenses go for about $35,000 dollars. I had numerous Kilfitt/Zoomar mount adapters for Alpa, Contarex, Minolta etc etc. Nikon do make some very good value binoculars. I haven't got any Nikon Action Ex as I don't need waterproofing. The 12x56 Nikon Roof prism I like, as I do the 12x56 Barr and Stroud. 25 degree C today. I had the air conditioner on. P.S. Not sure if some Schmidt cameras have flat fields at focus or if all are curved. Some do have special extra correcting optics. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon centralizes optical engineering
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top