What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon D850
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chosun Juan" data-source="post: 3608616" data-attributes="member: 92780"><p>If I understand correctly, the hi-res photos Nikon posted are RAW converted to Jpegs using the bundled software. Seeing that the 500mm f4 + 1.4xTC is a pretty sharp setup (and quite typical of what will be used in practice, if not even conservative - I know a few who use 1.7 or 2xTC's with 5 and 600 f4's) , I think I still would have expected more detail in the WBSE, particularly in the white on top of the head and back of the neck, given where the histogram sits, and given the exif data of a low ISO 400, aperture stopped down some to f6.7, and 1/3000th of a second shutter speed. ?:brains:?</p><p></p><p>I have been digging around a bit, and some early DR/ ISO/ SNR data (or constructions thereof) seems to 'clarify' some of the Nikon execs remarks. :smoke:</p><p></p><p>As I suspected :t: , the full stop improvement in ISO performance applies ONLY to the extended top end. ie.the performance of the new D850 at ISO 25600 is the same as the old D810 at ISO 12800.</p><p></p><p>The performance at the lowest end of the ISO range is the same despite the hike in resolution, and there are gains of ~ 1/3 to 1/2 stop in the mid range. So rather than lobbing somewhere in the range between the D750 and challenging the D5 in the midrange, as I had hoped, it looks like it might approach (or match) the D750 midrange performance. Time with production models and standardized testing will tell, but it looks like an improvement on the D810 :cat:</p><p></p><p>Some more emerging data here on this thread by Bill Claff of (<a href="http://www.PhotonsToPhotos.net" target="_blank">www.PhotonsToPhotos.net</a>) over on DPReview: <a href="https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60035567" target="_blank">https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60035567</a></p><p></p><p>Despite all the p**-p**ing on the interwebs by the Mirrorless /Video crowd, I think it is quite an exciting 'all-in-one' photography camera, and I look forward to getting my hands on one. I suppose whether it stays there depends on how well it actually tests, how I find the feel in the hand, how much of a 2500+ ISO improvement it shows over the D500, and how well the DX performance stacks up (mid range ISO performance, AF coverage and performance, and viewfinder experience), and if the focus stacking feature works in long range photography for me ..... and of course I'm going to have to dig up some sort of a deal - coz I ain't payin' retail in Oz ! :storm:</p><p></p><p>I think I will still be 90% birds, but the better grip and balance of the heavier D850 (over a D7200) should work well with big Super telephotos and the prospect of it also being a top notch landscape tool too, is pretty tantalizing! :king:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Chosun :gh:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chosun Juan, post: 3608616, member: 92780"] If I understand correctly, the hi-res photos Nikon posted are RAW converted to Jpegs using the bundled software. Seeing that the 500mm f4 + 1.4xTC is a pretty sharp setup (and quite typical of what will be used in practice, if not even conservative - I know a few who use 1.7 or 2xTC's with 5 and 600 f4's) , I think I still would have expected more detail in the WBSE, particularly in the white on top of the head and back of the neck, given where the histogram sits, and given the exif data of a low ISO 400, aperture stopped down some to f6.7, and 1/3000th of a second shutter speed. ?:brains:? I have been digging around a bit, and some early DR/ ISO/ SNR data (or constructions thereof) seems to 'clarify' some of the Nikon execs remarks. :smoke: As I suspected :t: , the full stop improvement in ISO performance applies ONLY to the extended top end. ie.the performance of the new D850 at ISO 25600 is the same as the old D810 at ISO 12800. The performance at the lowest end of the ISO range is the same despite the hike in resolution, and there are gains of ~ 1/3 to 1/2 stop in the mid range. So rather than lobbing somewhere in the range between the D750 and challenging the D5 in the midrange, as I had hoped, it looks like it might approach (or match) the D750 midrange performance. Time with production models and standardized testing will tell, but it looks like an improvement on the D810 :cat: Some more emerging data here on this thread by Bill Claff of ([url]www.PhotonsToPhotos.net[/url]) over on DPReview: [url]https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60035567[/url] Despite all the p**-p**ing on the interwebs by the Mirrorless /Video crowd, I think it is quite an exciting 'all-in-one' photography camera, and I look forward to getting my hands on one. I suppose whether it stays there depends on how well it actually tests, how I find the feel in the hand, how much of a 2500+ ISO improvement it shows over the D500, and how well the DX performance stacks up (mid range ISO performance, AF coverage and performance, and viewfinder experience), and if the focus stacking feature works in long range photography for me ..... and of course I'm going to have to dig up some sort of a deal - coz I ain't payin' retail in Oz ! :storm: I think I will still be 90% birds, but the better grip and balance of the heavier D850 (over a D7200) should work well with big Super telephotos and the prospect of it also being a top notch landscape tool too, is pretty tantalizing! :king: Chosun :gh: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon D850
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top