What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon D90 v D300
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gentoo" data-source="post: 1340149" data-attributes="member: 35131"><p>I don't agree with the ISO performance. I've tried them both myself and the D90, in my use, was equal to the D300 (Rockwell claims is slightly better but I think they are the same). The colors are the same as are most of the picture controls. The D300 is priced higher because it's the "prosumer" camera niche Nikon has. It isn't compatible with as many older lenses like the D300 is. It can't meter with older lenses by entering the lens info like the D300 can. It only has 11 focal points, not the 51 on the D300. I can't remember if the D90 can do the 3D tracking or not. None of these missing features change the image quality of the D90. They only impact the way you may or may not be able to use it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gentoo, post: 1340149, member: 35131"] I don't agree with the ISO performance. I've tried them both myself and the D90, in my use, was equal to the D300 (Rockwell claims is slightly better but I think they are the same). The colors are the same as are most of the picture controls. The D300 is priced higher because it's the "prosumer" camera niche Nikon has. It isn't compatible with as many older lenses like the D300 is. It can't meter with older lenses by entering the lens info like the D300 can. It only has 11 focal points, not the 51 on the D300. I can't remember if the D90 can do the 3D tracking or not. None of these missing features change the image quality of the D90. They only impact the way you may or may not be able to use it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon D90 v D300
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top