What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon D9300 DX rumoured
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="opticoholic" data-source="post: 3126438" data-attributes="member: 18608"><p>I'm sorry but respectfully I must offer an opposing view. I'm tired of hearing you guys tell me to just go get a D8XX and forget about DX. I still think APS-C is a more sensible format for bird photography simply because 99% of the time you will not be able to use the image outside the DX area, so it's like accepting a tool that is obviously not perfectly suited to the task. A D9300--done right--would be a better tool.</p><p></p><p>I will concede that if you need to shoot in less than ideal light conditions and use higher ISO, FX may be the best option. But <em>very often</em> I don't need to shoot at ISO more than 400. And under good light conditions, I'm just not convinced that the D8XX cameras will do a lot better than my D7100.</p><p></p><p>Since you're posting examples I will too. Convince me. Here are a 3 shots from my D7100, small jpegs showing the completely uncropped frame, and for fun I added additional black area outside the DX frame that approximates the FX frame. Show me some D8XX uncropped frames that compare to these. Click on the links to see larger finished jpegs. And after you convince me, please send me ~$1500 US, which is the approximate additional cost of a new D810 compared to what a D9300 would cost if it existed (D810 currently shows ~$3300 at B&H; I'm guessing a D9300 would come in ~$1800, same as the 7D MkII). OH, and I shoot a lot of <em>tiny</em> birds, so please throw in $40 to cover a DK-17M magnifying eyepiece to help me find that little flycatcher deep inside the DX crop. :-O</p><p></p><p><a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/38295196/_DSC0392_Red-shouldered_Hawk.jpg" target="_blank">https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/38295196/_DSC0392_Red-shouldered_Hawk.jpg</a></p><p><a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/38295196/_DSC2178_Osprey.jpg" target="_blank">https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/38295196/_DSC2178_Osprey.jpg</a></p><p><a href="https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/38295196/_DSC5300_Pacific_Slope_Flycatcher.JPG" target="_blank">https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/38295196/_DSC5300_Pacific_Slope_Flycatcher.JPG</a></p><p></p><p>Thank you!</p><p>Dave</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="opticoholic, post: 3126438, member: 18608"] I'm sorry but respectfully I must offer an opposing view. I'm tired of hearing you guys tell me to just go get a D8XX and forget about DX. I still think APS-C is a more sensible format for bird photography simply because 99% of the time you will not be able to use the image outside the DX area, so it's like accepting a tool that is obviously not perfectly suited to the task. A D9300--done right--would be a better tool. I will concede that if you need to shoot in less than ideal light conditions and use higher ISO, FX may be the best option. But [I]very often[/I] I don't need to shoot at ISO more than 400. And under good light conditions, I'm just not convinced that the D8XX cameras will do a lot better than my D7100. Since you're posting examples I will too. Convince me. Here are a 3 shots from my D7100, small jpegs showing the completely uncropped frame, and for fun I added additional black area outside the DX frame that approximates the FX frame. Show me some D8XX uncropped frames that compare to these. Click on the links to see larger finished jpegs. And after you convince me, please send me ~$1500 US, which is the approximate additional cost of a new D810 compared to what a D9300 would cost if it existed (D810 currently shows ~$3300 at B&H; I'm guessing a D9300 would come in ~$1800, same as the 7D MkII). OH, and I shoot a lot of [I]tiny[/I] birds, so please throw in $40 to cover a DK-17M magnifying eyepiece to help me find that little flycatcher deep inside the DX crop. :-O [url]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/38295196/_DSC0392_Red-shouldered_Hawk.jpg[/url] [url]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/38295196/_DSC2178_Osprey.jpg[/url] [url]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/38295196/_DSC5300_Pacific_Slope_Flycatcher.JPG[/url] Thank you! Dave [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Nikon
Nikon D9300 DX rumoured
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top