What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Nikon
Nikon ed 50!which lens is the best all rounder?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kevin Conville" data-source="post: 1519527" data-attributes="member: 63161"><p>Well maybe, but I was having fun with the numbers. Maybe it's one of those "written word" things.</p><p></p><p>So it was a <em><strong>joke</strong></em> when you wrote "FoV can be compensated for by panning the scope"? I misunderstood.</p><p></p><p>And, you were <em><strong>goofing</strong></em> on Alan Adler's magical mystery formula? I missed that too.</p><p></p><p>Next time I'll use more emoticons so as not to have my reply taken too seriously or personal. ;^)</p><p></p><p>Regarding FOV and Nikon EPs, the difference (I contend) IS significant between the zoom's and the DS's or MC wide's even at a far less distance than 1000m. I rarely hear the argument that AFOV makes little difference.</p><p></p><p>Cheers,</p><p>Kevin</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kevin Conville, post: 1519527, member: 63161"] Well maybe, but I was having fun with the numbers. Maybe it's one of those "written word" things. So it was a [I][B]joke[/B][/I] when you wrote "FoV can be compensated for by panning the scope"? I misunderstood. And, you were [I][B]goofing[/B][/I] on Alan Adler's magical mystery formula? I missed that too. Next time I'll use more emoticons so as not to have my reply taken too seriously or personal. ;^) Regarding FOV and Nikon EPs, the difference (I contend) IS significant between the zoom's and the DS's or MC wide's even at a far less distance than 1000m. I rarely hear the argument that AFOV makes little difference. Cheers, Kevin [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Nikon
Nikon ed 50!which lens is the best all rounder?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top
