What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Nikon Edg .
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kevin Purcell" data-source="post: 1760132" data-attributes="member: 68323"><p>Or if it was due to the previously rumored patent infringement issues (which of course were naver made explicit). </p><p></p><p>I wrote about this issue before. Clearly there is no patent on open bridge configuration: that has a long history of prior art. But the optomechanics in the bin is often patented and often interesting to see it (e.g. the Swaro EL mechanism is interesting). Perhaps they infringed (on a EU patent).</p><p></p><p>It does seem very odd to put a bin into production and then release the same optics in a new enclosure just a year or so later with a different look. That's a lot of work.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps it's a combination of the two: a optomech redesign to avoid patent issues which then lead the designers to reconsider the look. The two hinge open bridge is now passé so perhaps the single hinge open bridge enclosure was considered a bigger differentiator (as Kabsetz suggests).</p><p></p><p>Did the weight drop too? The specs for the 8x42 are now 785g (27.7 oz) in the PR but the Nikon Sport Optics web site hasn't been updated</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.nikonsportoptics.com/Products/Binoculars/EDG/index.page" target="_blank">http://www.nikonsportoptics.com/Products/Binoculars/EDG/index.page</a></p><p></p><p>says 28.6 ounces = 811 grams so the new version is perhaps 26g or almost 1 oz lighter than the older EDG. Perhaps that's another reason to go with the single hinge open-bridge design?</p><p></p><p>But it's still very odd. But it may make the older EDG collectible.</p><p></p><p>Rick, did you ask them about this. Did they very politely not answer the question? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kevin Purcell, post: 1760132, member: 68323"] Or if it was due to the previously rumored patent infringement issues (which of course were naver made explicit). I wrote about this issue before. Clearly there is no patent on open bridge configuration: that has a long history of prior art. But the optomechanics in the bin is often patented and often interesting to see it (e.g. the Swaro EL mechanism is interesting). Perhaps they infringed (on a EU patent). It does seem very odd to put a bin into production and then release the same optics in a new enclosure just a year or so later with a different look. That's a lot of work. Perhaps it's a combination of the two: a optomech redesign to avoid patent issues which then lead the designers to reconsider the look. The two hinge open bridge is now passé so perhaps the single hinge open bridge enclosure was considered a bigger differentiator (as Kabsetz suggests). Did the weight drop too? The specs for the 8x42 are now 785g (27.7 oz) in the PR but the Nikon Sport Optics web site hasn't been updated [url]http://www.nikonsportoptics.com/Products/Binoculars/EDG/index.page[/url] says 28.6 ounces = 811 grams so the new version is perhaps 26g or almost 1 oz lighter than the older EDG. Perhaps that's another reason to go with the single hinge open-bridge design? But it's still very odd. But it may make the older EDG collectible. Rick, did you ask them about this. Did they very politely not answer the question? ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Nikon Edg .
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top