What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Nikon Monarch HG
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chosun Juan" data-source="post: 3428731" data-attributes="member: 92780"><p>I wouldn't worry too much, I'm pretty sure these new HG's will be firmly 2nd tier ......... (o)<</p><p></p><p>They are smaller and lighter than the Vortex Razor HD, ie. Leica UVHD+ sized shorties, and with such wide fields and no mention of any 'FL' glass - only 'ED' glass, I would expect their handling of CA would be less than the best of the best alphas.</p><p></p><p>It will be interesting to see if these specs are indeed correct, and exactly 'how' Nikon has done it ..... :cat:</p><p></p><p>In comparison to even the Leicas they have much wider (SF-wide) fields, use a field flattener, are the same physical size, and yet weigh 100grams (4 0z) less ---- while using a magnesium chassis ???? We could hope that the chassis turns out to be FRP --- I wonder how far away they are from the Honda factory? maybe they've got their hands on some CFRP ! |<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />|</p><p></p><p>If these specs are correct, then Nikon seems to have done something that no other manufacturer has managed to do ...... I hope they actually have ! and have moved the game on in the process :king:</p><p></p><p>As far as the light transmission goes, I hope the 92% is the daylight figure, but have my doubts (there's no way they'll be up near 95% dennis! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />...... manufacturers should be forced to specify that 550nm daylight figure via a compulsory standard - think of all the money that would be saved on all the marketing cr*p ! :eek!: :t: By all means, wax lyrical about the ultimate peak, but give us the wavelength too ....... When I suggested (tongue in cheek <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> that Nikon had followed Zeiss's lead ---- It was by no means a good thing ! :scribe:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Chosun :gh:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chosun Juan, post: 3428731, member: 92780"] I wouldn't worry too much, I'm pretty sure these new HG's will be firmly 2nd tier ......... (o)< They are smaller and lighter than the Vortex Razor HD, ie. Leica UVHD+ sized shorties, and with such wide fields and no mention of any 'FL' glass - only 'ED' glass, I would expect their handling of CA would be less than the best of the best alphas. It will be interesting to see if these specs are indeed correct, and exactly 'how' Nikon has done it ..... :cat: In comparison to even the Leicas they have much wider (SF-wide) fields, use a field flattener, are the same physical size, and yet weigh 100grams (4 0z) less ---- while using a magnesium chassis ???? We could hope that the chassis turns out to be FRP --- I wonder how far away they are from the Honda factory? maybe they've got their hands on some CFRP ! |:P| If these specs are correct, then Nikon seems to have done something that no other manufacturer has managed to do ...... I hope they actually have ! and have moved the game on in the process :king: As far as the light transmission goes, I hope the 92% is the daylight figure, but have my doubts (there's no way they'll be up near 95% dennis! :)...... manufacturers should be forced to specify that 550nm daylight figure via a compulsory standard - think of all the money that would be saved on all the marketing cr*p ! :eek!: :t: By all means, wax lyrical about the ultimate peak, but give us the wavelength too ....... When I suggested (tongue in cheek :) that Nikon had followed Zeiss's lead ---- It was by no means a good thing ! :scribe: Chosun :gh: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Nikon Monarch HG
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top