Isn't there a higher F-# 600 mm on the books already? So why is an FP version necessary for those taking photos at the olympics, where the photographers as a rule are seated behind their tripods?
Niels
True, there is a 600 f4 FL already which tips the scales at 3.8kg. Gawd only knows when the lightweight 3rd generations of that range of supertele's are due - some haven't even made it to gen 2 yet ! ...... :h?:
I don't think those PRO's are the likely market for this PF lens (which would be a stop slower and less than half the weight). Those PRO's are likely to have a 70-200 f2.8, or 180-400 f4, or new (yet to be born) 120-300 f2.8 strapped to their side as a second system.
I raised the Olympics deadline purely in terms of the opportunity for 'free' marketing exposure available :t:
Then again perhaps I was too hopeful - as I have come to know Nikon (unfortunately), they will most likely delay and spread that market 'buzz' that the PF 600 f5.6 will give them until after the Olympics.
They will just ride high on the D6 and 120-300 f2.8 for the actual period of the Olympics .... this is one Leopard that doesn't want to change it's spots ! or so it seems ....... :cat:
Chosun :gh: