What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon Premier LX vs Swaro SLC ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brocknroller" data-source="post: 3273332" data-attributes="member: 665"><p>One big difference between the LXL and the SLC is the amount of distortion each has. For my eyes, the 10x42 SLC achieves a good balance of pincushion and AMD, with enough pincushion for smooth panning while not having too much to be distracting. </p><p></p><p>OTOH, the LXL has very little pincushion, which for me causes the image to roll as I pan. I assume from your comments above that you are immune to this effect? If so, you lucked out doubly on this deal. </p><p></p><p>It also means that you could've reached deeper into your pocket when you purchased your SLC and bought a 10x42 SV EL instead. Not much difference in edge performance despite the lack of field flatteners, but ergonomically I prefer the open bridge design, although the open hinge (high-bar H) design of the SLC is also fairly comfortable to hold, just not as comfortable as the EL. I would still chose the SLC because of the RB issue with the SV EL. </p><p></p><p>Post a photo when you can, I'd like to see how the armor held up. </p><p></p><p>Brock</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brocknroller, post: 3273332, member: 665"] One big difference between the LXL and the SLC is the amount of distortion each has. For my eyes, the 10x42 SLC achieves a good balance of pincushion and AMD, with enough pincushion for smooth panning while not having too much to be distracting. OTOH, the LXL has very little pincushion, which for me causes the image to roll as I pan. I assume from your comments above that you are immune to this effect? If so, you lucked out doubly on this deal. It also means that you could've reached deeper into your pocket when you purchased your SLC and bought a 10x42 SV EL instead. Not much difference in edge performance despite the lack of field flatteners, but ergonomically I prefer the open bridge design, although the open hinge (high-bar H) design of the SLC is also fairly comfortable to hold, just not as comfortable as the EL. I would still chose the SLC because of the RB issue with the SV EL. Post a photo when you can, I'd like to see how the armor held up. Brock [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon Premier LX vs Swaro SLC ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top