What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon Premier LX vs Swaro SLC ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brocknroller" data-source="post: 3274542" data-attributes="member: 665"><p>HERESY! DEFENDERS ASSEMBLE! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Funny that you should point out the LXL's color fidelity, because I felt that in terms of color in the LXL was an "infidel." Reds look a bit orangey compared to the Venturer LX, which has deeper, more realistic reds like the Nikon SE. Yellows really pop with the LXL, and on brightly lit objects such as leaves, the image can be TOO bright and wash out detail. Didn't experience that with the LX, and I had both models at the same time. </p><p></p><p>What I would like to see is the LX's optics in the LXL's lighter weight frame. Of course, I would still have to deal with the RB. </p><p></p><p>What you saw in the 7x36 ED2 was what I call "Rolling BOWL," rather than "rolling ball." It's due to too much pincushion rather than the lack of it. The result, however, is similar in that both extremes can cause the image to appear to roll. The difference is that with RB, the image is rolling over a positively curved surface, hence Holger's term the "globe effect," while with "rolling<em> bowl</em>," the image appears to roll over a negatively curved surface like the inside of a globe whose top half has been removed. </p><p></p><p>The result is the image in a bin you experience RB with pops out at you in the center and grows smaller at the edges whereas in a bin with "rolling bowl," the image in the center looks smaller than it does at the edge. When I looked at the flat road out ahead of me with the 7x ED2, it looked like it had a dip in it. When I looked at the rectangular dumpster, it looked saddle shaped, with the straight lines curved inward. </p><p></p><p>The "rolling bowl" in the 7x ED2 was even more noticeable while tilting the bin up and down trees, though I could see it while panning too. </p><p></p><p>So you didn't see RB with the ED2, which means you could be immune to it if that's what you're basing your previous experience on. </p><p></p><p>Brock</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brocknroller, post: 3274542, member: 665"] HERESY! DEFENDERS ASSEMBLE! ;) Funny that you should point out the LXL's color fidelity, because I felt that in terms of color in the LXL was an "infidel." Reds look a bit orangey compared to the Venturer LX, which has deeper, more realistic reds like the Nikon SE. Yellows really pop with the LXL, and on brightly lit objects such as leaves, the image can be TOO bright and wash out detail. Didn't experience that with the LX, and I had both models at the same time. What I would like to see is the LX's optics in the LXL's lighter weight frame. Of course, I would still have to deal with the RB. What you saw in the 7x36 ED2 was what I call "Rolling BOWL," rather than "rolling ball." It's due to too much pincushion rather than the lack of it. The result, however, is similar in that both extremes can cause the image to appear to roll. The difference is that with RB, the image is rolling over a positively curved surface, hence Holger's term the "globe effect," while with "rolling[I] bowl[/I]," the image appears to roll over a negatively curved surface like the inside of a globe whose top half has been removed. The result is the image in a bin you experience RB with pops out at you in the center and grows smaller at the edges whereas in a bin with "rolling bowl," the image in the center looks smaller than it does at the edge. When I looked at the flat road out ahead of me with the 7x ED2, it looked like it had a dip in it. When I looked at the rectangular dumpster, it looked saddle shaped, with the straight lines curved inward. The "rolling bowl" in the 7x ED2 was even more noticeable while tilting the bin up and down trees, though I could see it while panning too. So you didn't see RB with the ED2, which means you could be immune to it if that's what you're basing your previous experience on. Brock [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon Premier LX vs Swaro SLC ?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top