What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Nikon SE 8x32 vs. Zeiss Victory FL 7x42 T* ???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jaymoynihan" data-source="post: 1557567" data-attributes="member: 50493"><p>I am not an optics expert or designer. But i do remember reading about the porro and roof designs. If i remember correctly, the roof has more optical surfaces and "bounces" in the light path. So, it is harder to control aberrations. The intro of phase coatings (1980's ?) for roof was to that end.</p><p></p><p>It is a commonly held view (including by me) that you can do a porro for cheaper than a roof, at the same level of optical quality. I think the 8x32 SE, and the Swift Audubons are probably proof of that. </p><p></p><p>Hypothetically, it is not that one is inherently better than the other, optically. It is a question re the roofs, of how much are you willing/able to pay?</p><p></p><p>I think the advantage of the roof design is the ergonomics, and true weather sealing. I have been told by folks that do design and repair optics, that no central focusing porro is truly "waterproof", i.e. submersable for more than a couple minutes. This makes sense, given that a porro's focusing movement is not internal, like a roof's is.</p><p></p><p>Actually, another example of the roof vs porro cost is the Bushnell 7x26 Elite Custom (formally the Bausch & Lomb 7x26 custom). The majority of reviewer's, and folk who have tried them vs the roof compacts, agree that this little reverse-porro is optically the best compact binocular, optically. </p><p>The alpha brand compacts go for 2 to 2.5 times the cost of this one. I think they could match it, but the cost point probably not be attractive to consumers since it is a compact.</p><p></p><p>I use both designs myself. But i baby my SE's. For the same mag/aperture, the Zeiss 8x30's go on the hike <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jaymoynihan, post: 1557567, member: 50493"] I am not an optics expert or designer. But i do remember reading about the porro and roof designs. If i remember correctly, the roof has more optical surfaces and "bounces" in the light path. So, it is harder to control aberrations. The intro of phase coatings (1980's ?) for roof was to that end. It is a commonly held view (including by me) that you can do a porro for cheaper than a roof, at the same level of optical quality. I think the 8x32 SE, and the Swift Audubons are probably proof of that. Hypothetically, it is not that one is inherently better than the other, optically. It is a question re the roofs, of how much are you willing/able to pay? I think the advantage of the roof design is the ergonomics, and true weather sealing. I have been told by folks that do design and repair optics, that no central focusing porro is truly "waterproof", i.e. submersable for more than a couple minutes. This makes sense, given that a porro's focusing movement is not internal, like a roof's is. Actually, another example of the roof vs porro cost is the Bushnell 7x26 Elite Custom (formally the Bausch & Lomb 7x26 custom). The majority of reviewer's, and folk who have tried them vs the roof compacts, agree that this little reverse-porro is optically the best compact binocular, optically. The alpha brand compacts go for 2 to 2.5 times the cost of this one. I think they could match it, but the cost point probably not be attractive to consumers since it is a compact. I use both designs myself. But i baby my SE's. For the same mag/aperture, the Zeiss 8x30's go on the hike ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Nikon SE 8x32 vs. Zeiss Victory FL 7x42 T* ???
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top