What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Nikon SE 8x32 vs. Zeiss Victory FL 7x42 T* ???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nessus" data-source="post: 1714829" data-attributes="member: 73076"><p>Recently I was on the 12th floor of a building in NYC and a woman had a pair of tasco 10x50 porros. I asked to have a look ready to laugh at them and feel great about how superior my FL's were and I was absofreakinglutely blown away by the brightness and sharpness. They were just as bright as my 10x42 FL's and probably cost under $100.</p><p></p><p> The trick was the apparent field of view was half the size. They made a great design decision and took all that light they lost with poor coatings and just made the AFOV half the size and got all of their brightness back that way, plus by being porros they had an advantage to begin with. Let me tell you they were very sharp in the center and extremely good edge to edge also. I had my FL 10x42's in my bag and I left them right there because for sure no one was going to get a wow out of them, they were getting just about the same view only with a much smaller circle.</p><p></p><p> I learned my lesson that day just how good even a cheap a porro can be.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nessus, post: 1714829, member: 73076"] Recently I was on the 12th floor of a building in NYC and a woman had a pair of tasco 10x50 porros. I asked to have a look ready to laugh at them and feel great about how superior my FL's were and I was absofreakinglutely blown away by the brightness and sharpness. They were just as bright as my 10x42 FL's and probably cost under $100. The trick was the apparent field of view was half the size. They made a great design decision and took all that light they lost with poor coatings and just made the AFOV half the size and got all of their brightness back that way, plus by being porros they had an advantage to begin with. Let me tell you they were very sharp in the center and extremely good edge to edge also. I had my FL 10x42's in my bag and I left them right there because for sure no one was going to get a wow out of them, they were getting just about the same view only with a much smaller circle. I learned my lesson that day just how good even a cheap a porro can be. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
Nikon SE 8x32 vs. Zeiss Victory FL 7x42 T* ???
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top