What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Noctivid 8x42 tested vs HT and SV Field pro.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GLOBETROTTER" data-source="post: 3496434" data-attributes="member: 130396"><p>To be honest and having used both HT & NV in the field for a while the NV surpass the HT in glare control by a country mile, in fact every time i can see slight withe veil thru the HT when compare with the NV.</p><p></p><p>Same happen when people compare the old FL vs the HT so there is a improvement.</p><p></p><p>The 3D of the NV and plasticity is there and is not needed to be a photographer or cinematographer with a very well trained eye to pick up this details.</p><p></p><p>The color is better in the NV than HT, the contrast like 2 times better etc etc.</p><p></p><p>For me is a clear improvement and having used both side by side in many different light conditions shows me the true different more than a quick look at your local seller.</p><p></p><p>Take a look to this links guys </p><p></p><p><a href="http://petapixel.com/2016/03/14/problem-modern-lenses/" target="_blank">http://petapixel.com/2016/03/14/problem-modern-lenses/</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GLOBETROTTER, post: 3496434, member: 130396"] To be honest and having used both HT & NV in the field for a while the NV surpass the HT in glare control by a country mile, in fact every time i can see slight withe veil thru the HT when compare with the NV. Same happen when people compare the old FL vs the HT so there is a improvement. The 3D of the NV and plasticity is there and is not needed to be a photographer or cinematographer with a very well trained eye to pick up this details. The color is better in the NV than HT, the contrast like 2 times better etc etc. For me is a clear improvement and having used both side by side in many different light conditions shows me the true different more than a quick look at your local seller. Take a look to this links guys [url]http://petapixel.com/2016/03/14/problem-modern-lenses/[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Noctivid 8x42 tested vs HT and SV Field pro.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top