massaging records
Mark
you know people on the norfolk committe read this thread ?!?
Your point Stu!?!!!! All kinds of stuff gets discussed on this forum from the alledged drug taking of some, the ongoing progress on individuals colds and the driving/parking abilities of others!!!
As for the records commitee reading the thread, what is the big deal!! The honesty and reputations of individual Norfolk birders are well known. Also committees can see when a description is written straight from a book. There is a recent rejected recorded of a Whites Thrush at Hartlepool headland. The bird was a fly by. I have no doubt the bird was a Whites Thrush. However I understand the description was so perfect/detailed, you would have thought the bird would have been trapped. On that basis the record was rejected. A harsh lesson for the finder. Had he written what he had seen, the record would have been accepted. There is a lesson, describe what you see a no more!!
We all hope that any good birds we find (not many in my case) are seen by others and even better photographed.
I know Josh has had some stick about a Red footed falcon he saw last year. Again having birded with Josh he is more than capable indentifying a Red foot!
Josh is honest and will only describe what he saw. I think he has to be given credit for that. There are some who would pick up there collins and copy it word for word!!
Good luck with the year list!:cat: