Code of conned duck ?
but I don't think I am the only person to talk in code on this thread
Wasn’t really having a dig @ u, Nick, but the possible mass use of these things. I see that you, too, replied in the same lightly humorous spirit of my post. As I said, some US info sites consist of strings of similar codes and are as dry as some of our rivers and reservoirs (R&R). Certainly, in the field and in texts, once the user (and recipient) has mastered them, they must be invaluably time-and-space-saving.
I use abbrevs., like ev’ry1 else. But, there is a limit !
If an abbreviation more than momentarily impedes the reading of a passage, then it’s not fulfilling one of its functions- speedily to facilitate meaning.
[‘STD’, for instance, applies not just to telephonic communication. And, as for Stone Curlew (TN) and Spotted Redshank (DR), just to pluck two from the list (I’m glad I didn’t have to work these things out: is there an account, somewhere?)- these must be learned.]
Thus, it is counter-productive and, rather in the manner of someone who constantly utilises poly-syllabic and/or arcane vocabulary, causes perplexity to and the consternation of the
οἱ πολλοί.
As for the ‘purpose’ of this thread: Shirley, a variety of them- ‘all things to all’.
I agree, therefore, that they are definitely “worth sharing”. I, for one, have downloaded the ‘cheat sheet’ (cs).