I'd like to know too (I do have a vested interest though). Surely if there are Pochard genes in there they didn't enter in the bird's recent ancestry?
It's a pretty good looking fudge, but the head is more pochard shaped IMO, sloping forehead and peaked crown. The other wrong feature is the black on bill tip, should only be the nail on fudge, this bird has quite an extensive black tip(close to a quarter of the bill).
Though I can only say this due to the excellent set of photographs. I'm pretty sure the snettisham female from a few years back was poo-pooed by some for similar reasons.
Hi jimmyI don't know about the head profile, but I think there's nothing wrong with the bill given that this bird is a female. The black nail is only a requirement for purity in adult males, and having taken a look at photos on Birdguides (including from the breeding range) I don't think the black is too extensive for a female.
And yes, brilliant photos!
Hi jimmy
Not according to the bible "Macmillan guide to bird I.D"!
In a quick google search of female ferruginous duck, all of the birds i can see with a more extensive black bill tip are labelled as presumed hybrids.
Where did you read only adult males require the black nail ? I'm not questioning you, just interested as Macmillan is normally spot on
Cheers Stuart
Could we have the first evidence ever that 'the bible' is wrong? :eek!:
Well I guess it was written back in the late 80's and knowledge may have advanced since then, but would you trust a book with no pictures over the bible?![]()
I'm pretty sure the snettisham female from a few years back was poo-pooed by some for similar reasons.
So it seems that other than the nail on the bill (which seems to be a little subjective) nobody can give an info as to who did and why this suddenly was turned into a hybrid? Anyone know any of the Birdguides lot to ask?