What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
North American splits
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kirk Roth" data-source="post: 1797143" data-attributes="member: 85015"><p>Richard, Joseph, and Peter, thank you for sharing the papers. I've always liked IOC's stated rationale, and I must admit that I am fairly unfamiliar with BOU policies, but from the paper here, it seems similar. I shouldn't have implied that NOBODY had proposed good, holistic species principals (I didn't mean to, anyway), but sometimes I question their implementation.</p><p></p><p>The scrub jay example that I mentioned before is a place where I think the mark may have been missed. Rosy Finches have already been mentioned. I also have a hard time understanding Cabot's Tern as a species, just because the Elegant Tern is nested within or Sandwich Tern populations. But perhaps I'm missing something - its easy for someone like me to be critical from the "outside," without sitting through long taxonomic committee discussions!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>On the topic of "molt timing speciation," a big candidate would be Eastern vs. Western Painted Buntings.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kirk Roth, post: 1797143, member: 85015"] Richard, Joseph, and Peter, thank you for sharing the papers. I've always liked IOC's stated rationale, and I must admit that I am fairly unfamiliar with BOU policies, but from the paper here, it seems similar. I shouldn't have implied that NOBODY had proposed good, holistic species principals (I didn't mean to, anyway), but sometimes I question their implementation. The scrub jay example that I mentioned before is a place where I think the mark may have been missed. Rosy Finches have already been mentioned. I also have a hard time understanding Cabot's Tern as a species, just because the Elegant Tern is nested within or Sandwich Tern populations. But perhaps I'm missing something - its easy for someone like me to be critical from the "outside," without sitting through long taxonomic committee discussions! On the topic of "molt timing speciation," a big candidate would be Eastern vs. Western Painted Buntings. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
North American splits
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top