• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Northern Fulmar (1 Viewer)

Richard Klim

-------------------------
Kerr & Dove (in press). Delimiting shades of gray: phylogeography of the Northern Fulmar, Fulmarus glacialis. Ecol Evol. [abstract] [pdf]
The current taxonomic status of F. glacialis is inconsistent with the treatment of other species within the Procellariiformes. The Atlantic and Pacific populations display genetic (and morphological) divergence comparable to that observed between other Procellariid sister species, and appear to be on independent evolutionary trajectories. Divergence date estimates indicate that the Atlantic and Pacific populations may have persisted independently for nearly 2 million years, spanning over warm interglacial periods that may have drastically reduced ice cover (Anderson et al. 2006). Consequently, taxonomic boundaries within this genus warrant reconsideration and we would recommend elevating the Pacific population to a separate species. Despite the significant genetic divergence between these two populations, not even fast-evolving regions such as the mitochondrial control region distinguish the two named Atlantic subspecies and thus we support the decision of some authors not to recognize F. g. auduboni as a valid subspecies.
Rodgers's Fulmar Fulmarus (glacialis) rodgersii was lumped in the AOU Check-list 4th Edition (1931), ref AOU 1919.

Auduboni is recognised as a subspecies by Harrison 1983 (Seabirds), Carboneras 1992 (HBW 1), Onley & Scofield 2007 (Albatrosses, Petrels & Shearwaters), Dunn & Alderfer 2011 (Field Guide to Birds of North America), Mallory et al 2012 (BNA Online), H&M4, IOC and Clements;
but is treated as a synonym of glacialis by Cramp et al 1977 (BWP 1), Parkin & Knox 2010 (Status of Birds in Britain & Ireland), Howell 2012 (Petrels, Albatrosses & Storm-Petrels of North America), AERC and BOURC.
 
Last edited:
Their are 3 specimens apparently considered types of rogersii in the USNM. The one Cassin was obviously referring too and the sole representative of the type series is USNM 21304. This is labelled North Pacific Ocean and was collected on the US Ex Ex. The Ex Ex didn't spend very much time in the Indian Ocean and Northern Fulmars have ?never been reported there so I assume the designated tpe locality is just a lapsus on Cassins part. It would appear that Hartert 1920 re-designated the type locality as the Bering and Copper Islands.

If one compares the DNA of a bird from the type locality of auduboni (Newfoundland) and one from the type locality of glacialis (St Kilda) you would conclude that they have no haplotypes in common. There are also subtle but real morphometric differences. The justification for splitting rogersii is therefore equally valid for splitting auduboni.

I think one would be premature to recognise this split.
 
BNA Online

Mallory, Hatch & Nettleship 2012...
Geographic Variation

Broad geographic variation in plumage polymorphism and bill length size is well documented (Salomonsen 1965, Van Franeker and Wattel 1982, van Franeker 1986, Hatch 1993). With rare exception, boreal fulmars of the ne. Atlantic are light-morph birds (van Franeker and Wattel 1982, van Franeker and Luttik 2008), yet in the high arctic are predominantly dark or of intermediate shade, although most breeders on ne. Baffin I. are light (Fig. 2, Appendix 1). Variation in the Pacific is striking in that there are greater extremes of shade—a lighter light morph and darker dark morph—than occur anywhere in Atlantic. Moreover, the latitudinal distribution of color morphs is roughly reversed between Pacific and Atlantic (Fig. 2). In the North Atlantic, bill length and body size tend to increase in a clinal manner from the high arctic south to the boreal zone (Van Franeker and Wattel 1982). Bill length is intermediate in the Pacific, where the bill is more slender. Some Pacific populations are notably small (Appendix 2; see also Measurements: mass, below)

Subspecies

Three subspecies, following Jouanin and Mougin (1979). Although some authorities have questioned the existence of two subspecies in the Atlantic Ocean (e.g., Cramp and Simmons 1977, van Franeker 1986), Salomonsen (1965) and Van Franeker and Wattel (1982) argued that northern (high arctic) and southern (low arctic) populations could be diagnosed. Size varies between sexes, with females averaging smaller (Van Franeker and Wattel 1982), so subspecific comparisons must be made with properly sexed birds. Apparent divergence in genetic barcode led Kerr et al. (2007) to suggest that Atlantic and Pacific taxa are distinct species.

F. g. glacialis (Linnaeus, 1761). Includes Procellaria grönlandica Gunnerus, 1767; P. cinerea Gunnerus, 1767; P. hyemalis Brehm, 1824; P. hiemalis Brehm, 1831; P. melanonyx Nilsson, 1835; F. g. minor (Kjärbölling, 1854); P. borealis Brehm, 1855; and F. g. communis (Brehm, 1866). Largely restricted to the Arctic Ocean, where it breeds on Baffin I., ne. Greenland, Spitsbergen, Franz Josef Land, and n. Russia [type locality = Spitsbergen, fide Mathews 1934]. Polymorphic, with a dark morph predominant in many populations; averages small, with the bill short and rather wide.

F. g. auduboni Bonaparte, 1857. Largely a n. Atlantic species, where it breeds in ne. Canada, w. Greenland, Iceland, Jan Mayen, the United Kingdom, and locally in nw. Europe [type locality = Newfoundland]. Light morph only; averages large, with the bill long and rather wide.

F. g. rodgersii Cassin, 1862. Includes F. g. pacificus (Audubon, 1839); F. g. glupischa Stejneger, 1884; and F. g. columba Anthony, 1895. Restricted to the Pacific Ocean, where it breeds in the n. Pacific on the Commander and Kurile Is. and, in the United States, the Aleutian and Pribilof Is. [type locality = n. Pacific Ocean, fide Deignan (1961)]. Polymorphic, with populations largely mixed; body size small to intermediate, with the bill rather slender.
 
Last edited:
The ex ex was the Wilkes expedition 1838ish not the expedition lead by Captain Rodgers (1853-1855?) . Here is a book by one of the officers where he describes sailing from Simon Town South Africa to Java. Months of time in the Indian Ocean.
http://books.google.com/books?id=FdYMAAAAIAAJ&source=gbs_navlinks_s .
Deignan 1961 here:
Fulmarus Rodgersii Cassin Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, p. 326 (not earlier than June 24), 1862.
=Fulmarus glacialis rodgersii Cassin. See Peters, Checklist of birds of the world 1:47, 1931.
21304. Adult in light phase (sex not indicated). Northern Pacific Ocean
(not South Indian Ocean). 1855 or 1856. Collected by William
Stimpson? U.S. North Pacific Surveying and Exploring Expedition
(1853-1856).
The oldest label (not original) has "Locality?," but Cassin himself in
1861 entered the locality into the museum register as "North Pacific."

Stimpson was naturalist on the Vincennes. Went hunting for “quail” at Simon’s Town harbor in S. Africa.
I believe all Cassin did was write where the bird was from, the The North Pacific Surveying and Exploring Expedition, he was a lot closer in time to the collection of the bird and he published his opinion that the bird was collected in the Indian Ocean.
 
Last edited:
Hmm interesting.

2 odd things:

First yes it is the North Pacific Surveying and Exploring Expedition in the 1850s but the Smithsonian Catalogue states that USNM21304 is a dark phase bird.

I reiterate however that there appear to be no records of glacialis from the Indian Ocean and the fact that Cassin himself altered the label indicates either a lapsus or something more interesting.

An intriguing possibility does exist as Southern Fulmar is of course common in the southern latitudes of the Indian Ocean and it is clear that Stimpson would have had a chance of collecting such in the Indian Ocean.

But of course glacialoides only has a light phase. So why does Deignan 1961 state it is a light phase bird??

And yes Spitzbergen does appear to be right for the designated type locality of P. glacialis but this is almost more by original designation as Linnaeus mentions both Martens Spitzbergen book and Andersons Iceland and Greenland books. The reference to Martens put me off as one of the earliest literature references to Fulmar is "The Fulmar" in Martin (1688) A late voyage to St.Kilda.

An odd coincidence.

That being the case there is a case for saying that birds from the type localities of auduboni and glacialis share some haplotypes but the choice of nucleic markers isn't really adequate to say much further.
 
Last edited:
Northeast Atlantic

Burg, Bird, Lait & Brooke (in press). Colonization pathways of the northeast Atlantic by northern fulmars: a test of James Fisher's 'out of Iceland' hypothesis using museum collections. J Avian Biol. [abstract]
 
North Atlantic

Flood & van Grouw 2015. Unfamiliar plumage types of Fulmars in the North Atlantic. Brit Birds 108(6): 331–348.
Abstract We investigate records of three unfamiliar plumage types of the Fulmar Fulmarus glacialis in the North Atlantic: extra pale, extra dark and those with a dark distal tail-band. The possible explanations for each case are: 1) aberrant or variant 'Atlantic Fulmar' F. g. glacialis; 2) hitherto unrecorded morphs of Atlantic Fulmar; and 3) vagrant 'Pacific Fulmar' F. g. rodgersii. We conclude that all records involve aberrant or variant Atlantic Fulmars. A dark distal tail-band noted on about 5% of Fulmars in Spitsbergen is a previously unreported variation.
[F&vG treat auduboni as a synonym of nominate glacialis.]
 
Last edited:
Warning! This thread is more than 9 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top