What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Omid's innovation (split from 'new Leica binocular' thread)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ronh" data-source="post: 3453557" data-attributes="member: 55514"><p>Omid,</p><p></p><p>You seem to searching for things about the magnified view that don't line up with naked eye. I'd like to share one of the few tiny tidbits that I understand in this department: the distorting effect of magnification on perspective. I'll explain by an example.</p><p></p><p>Imagine two objects, 100 and 1000 yards from the viewer. At 10x magnification, they will appear to be 10 and 100 yards away, respectively, or, separated by 90 yards.</p><p></p><p>But, if you simply walked 90 yards closer and viewed them by naked eye, they would appear at their true distances, which would then be 10 and 910 yards away.</p><p></p><p>So, in that sense, magnification is not equivalent to being closer. Magnification could be said to compress or weaken perspective.</p><p></p><p>Now the wacky part. I am of the opinion that the artificially enhanced 3D effect of a big Porro like a marine 7x50 gives back some of the perspective robbed by magnification, resulting in a, frankly, doubly screwed up, but altogether "more natural" view. Ha!</p><p></p><p>Ron</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ronh, post: 3453557, member: 55514"] Omid, You seem to searching for things about the magnified view that don't line up with naked eye. I'd like to share one of the few tiny tidbits that I understand in this department: the distorting effect of magnification on perspective. I'll explain by an example. Imagine two objects, 100 and 1000 yards from the viewer. At 10x magnification, they will appear to be 10 and 100 yards away, respectively, or, separated by 90 yards. But, if you simply walked 90 yards closer and viewed them by naked eye, they would appear at their true distances, which would then be 10 and 910 yards away. So, in that sense, magnification is not equivalent to being closer. Magnification could be said to compress or weaken perspective. Now the wacky part. I am of the opinion that the artificially enhanced 3D effect of a big Porro like a marine 7x50 gives back some of the perspective robbed by magnification, resulting in a, frankly, doubly screwed up, but altogether "more natural" view. Ha! Ron [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
Omid's innovation (split from 'new Leica binocular' thread)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top