What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Optic Snobs.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dave Kennedy" data-source="post: 1250455" data-attributes="member: 57986"><p>I own a pair of lightweight Nikon 10x25's which I have had for at least 18-20 years, I can't remember. They have been with me to Europe, all over Africa, Australia, Hawaii, Canada, Kazakhstan (in winter at -40 degrees C.), Cuba, Mexico, and so on. They have been dropped, repaired, dropped again, and on one occasion when I was driving an open safari vehicle and got caught in the mother of thunderstorms, they got so wet that an ecosystem started growing inside them. They are currently (and have been for about the past ten years) held together by two strips of Elastoplast. Take a look at the photo and you will see them clearly. They cost me the equivalent of around 70 pounds. My son has a pair of Swarovskis which cost sixteen times as much. But I wouldn't change my old Nikons for anything. Because, quite simply, I have never found a pair of binoculars which are so well suited to my eyes. And that's all that matters.</p><p>Best wishes,</p><p>Dave Kennedy</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dave Kennedy, post: 1250455, member: 57986"] I own a pair of lightweight Nikon 10x25's which I have had for at least 18-20 years, I can't remember. They have been with me to Europe, all over Africa, Australia, Hawaii, Canada, Kazakhstan (in winter at -40 degrees C.), Cuba, Mexico, and so on. They have been dropped, repaired, dropped again, and on one occasion when I was driving an open safari vehicle and got caught in the mother of thunderstorms, they got so wet that an ecosystem started growing inside them. They are currently (and have been for about the past ten years) held together by two strips of Elastoplast. Take a look at the photo and you will see them clearly. They cost me the equivalent of around 70 pounds. My son has a pair of Swarovskis which cost sixteen times as much. But I wouldn't change my old Nikons for anything. Because, quite simply, I have never found a pair of binoculars which are so well suited to my eyes. And that's all that matters. Best wishes, Dave Kennedy [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Optic Snobs.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top