What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Optical performance: Nikon 8x32 SE vs the new EDG?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ThoLa" data-source="post: 1343388" data-attributes="member: 50374"><p>There we are. Yes, watertight Porro models exist. :t:</p><p>And they do not cost fortunes. </p><p></p><p>Nikon Action EX </p><p>Pentax PCF WPII , .... </p><p></p><p>So it can be done at a moderate cost, and the companies in question have the knowhow. </p><p></p><p>So I guess it is the expenditure/profit return ratio that is an issue here. Salesnumbers of these models are probably deemed inadequate to justify a redesign. </p><p></p><p>Swarovski shows it can be done at the high level without compromising the design (Habicht Porros). Even the focussing of these gems is significantly better than that of a lot of mediocre roof prism instruments. There does not seem to be a grave rearrangement of any internal components. Maybe the SE is altogether different(?). </p><p></p><p>The bottom line is: for the Porristo who seeks top quality there is but one road to travel (or did I miss a side-street?)</p><p></p><p>Tom</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ThoLa, post: 1343388, member: 50374"] There we are. Yes, watertight Porro models exist. :t: And they do not cost fortunes. Nikon Action EX Pentax PCF WPII , .... So it can be done at a moderate cost, and the companies in question have the knowhow. So I guess it is the expenditure/profit return ratio that is an issue here. Salesnumbers of these models are probably deemed inadequate to justify a redesign. Swarovski shows it can be done at the high level without compromising the design (Habicht Porros). Even the focussing of these gems is significantly better than that of a lot of mediocre roof prism instruments. There does not seem to be a grave rearrangement of any internal components. Maybe the SE is altogether different(?). The bottom line is: for the Porristo who seeks top quality there is but one road to travel (or did I miss a side-street?) Tom [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Nikon
Optical performance: Nikon 8x32 SE vs the new EDG?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top