What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optical Performance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pompadour" data-source="post: 2317240" data-attributes="member: 104665"><p>Frank,</p><p></p><p>First, thank you very much for the so prompt and detailed reply to my query which is really useful to me.</p><p></p><p>I would like to write at greater length than this, but various commitments keep me from it, including a thread I started today (in which I am happy to see you’re a contributor) that demands a lot of attention (something you of all people must be quite familiar with!) For now:</p><p></p><p>1. I think the criteria should be kept to the original three to be effective. More on this when...</p><p></p><p>2. It seems to me that a major factor in your “field” parameter you have not mentioned is the exit pupil.</p><p></p><p>3. From point ‘2’: why else, I wonder, would you rate the Zeiss Victory 7x42 over the 8x32, which has a bigger apparent (or perceived) FOV and better edge performance. (I know about these bins only by reading about them.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pompadour, post: 2317240, member: 104665"] Frank, First, thank you very much for the so prompt and detailed reply to my query which is really useful to me. I would like to write at greater length than this, but various commitments keep me from it, including a thread I started today (in which I am happy to see you’re a contributor) that demands a lot of attention (something you of all people must be quite familiar with!) For now: 1. I think the criteria should be kept to the original three to be effective. More on this when... 2. It seems to me that a major factor in your “field” parameter you have not mentioned is the exit pupil. 3. From point ‘2’: why else, I wonder, would you rate the Zeiss Victory 7x42 over the 8x32, which has a bigger apparent (or perceived) FOV and better edge performance. (I know about these bins only by reading about them.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optical Performance
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top