What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optical quality versus the whole package...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fireform" data-source="post: 1372932" data-attributes="member: 65457"><p>I would have agreed with this once upon a time, but I do find that differences even among the Alphas are visible to me sometimes. I couldn't begin to tell you why that is, but I've compared Alpha roofs among each other and seen distinct differences in the image. Not that one is categorically better than another, but that one looked distinctly better to my eye.</p><p></p><p>The obvious example for me is the Nikon SE porro. They aren't waterproof and they have those antique fold-down eyecups--two big strikes against them in the total package view of things. But the view through them is so good, and they excel so much at resolving subtle textures and colors, that I'll take them almost any time over any roof bin you can name. The only exception being if I know for sure that I'm likely to get soaked or snowed on--then I might take my roofs, but I won't always be happy about it.</p><p></p><p>I've gotten rid of highly regarded glass because it wasn't right for me ergonomically, too, like the 7x42 zeiss classics I once had. Everyone raves about how comfortable they are to use, except me I guess.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fireform, post: 1372932, member: 65457"] I would have agreed with this once upon a time, but I do find that differences even among the Alphas are visible to me sometimes. I couldn't begin to tell you why that is, but I've compared Alpha roofs among each other and seen distinct differences in the image. Not that one is categorically better than another, but that one looked distinctly better to my eye. The obvious example for me is the Nikon SE porro. They aren't waterproof and they have those antique fold-down eyecups--two big strikes against them in the total package view of things. But the view through them is so good, and they excel so much at resolving subtle textures and colors, that I'll take them almost any time over any roof bin you can name. The only exception being if I know for sure that I'm likely to get soaked or snowed on--then I might take my roofs, but I won't always be happy about it. I've gotten rid of highly regarded glass because it wasn't right for me ergonomically, too, like the 7x42 zeiss classics I once had. Everyone raves about how comfortable they are to use, except me I guess. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optical quality versus the whole package...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top