What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optical quality versus the whole package...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kevin Purcell" data-source="post: 1393523" data-attributes="member: 68323"><p>See this article</p><p></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberration_in_optical_systems" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberration_in_optical_systems</a></p><p></p><p>particularly the bit about Zernike model of aberrations. </p><p></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberration_in_optical_systems#Zernike_model_of_aberrations" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberration_in_optical_systems#Zernike_model_of_aberrations</a></p><p></p><p>As you increase the oder of the polynomial you get a different aberration. I think the bottom five are the ones they can measure for the eye using a wavefront analyzer. If your optician doesn't show you the output ask to see it. It's rather fun in a geeky way.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberration_in_optical_systems#Zernike_model_of_aberrations" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberration_in_optical_systems#Zernike_model_of_aberrations</a></p><p></p><p>and this presentation is a good introduction</p><p></p><p><a href="http://scien.stanford.edu/class/psych221/projects/03/pmaeda/index_files/ppt_presentation.ppt" target="_blank">http://scien.stanford.edu/class/psych221/projects/03/pmaeda/index_files/ppt_presentation.ppt</a></p><p></p><p>this paper is a bit more focused</p><p></p><p><a href="http://research.opt.indiana.edu/Library/Mopane2003/CampbellC2/Campbell_C_2.pdf" target="_blank">http://research.opt.indiana.edu/Library/Mopane2003/CampbellC2/Campbell_C_2.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>You can diagnose them but you will never be able to correct them with a simple lens or even a fancy shaped eyeglass lens. But contact lens might be a possibility (though I suspect you can't register them with the properly). It's possible laser eye surgery might go in this direction though right now some of the failures of laser eye surgery are due to higher order aberrations.</p><p></p><p>If you can using interesting systems (spatial light modulators ... they're not just for Loony Tunes cartoons <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> ) you might be able to correct some of these in the future. See this paper:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.eurocongress.com.pl/do2005/DO_manuscript/lectures/L-044.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.eurocongress.com.pl/do2005/DO_manuscript/lectures/L-044.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>Imagine an image stablizing, abberation correcting and user adapting binocular of The Future ...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kevin Purcell, post: 1393523, member: 68323"] See this article [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberration_in_optical_systems[/url] particularly the bit about Zernike model of aberrations. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberration_in_optical_systems#Zernike_model_of_aberrations[/url] As you increase the oder of the polynomial you get a different aberration. I think the bottom five are the ones they can measure for the eye using a wavefront analyzer. If your optician doesn't show you the output ask to see it. It's rather fun in a geeky way. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberration_in_optical_systems#Zernike_model_of_aberrations[/url] and this presentation is a good introduction [url]http://scien.stanford.edu/class/psych221/projects/03/pmaeda/index_files/ppt_presentation.ppt[/url] this paper is a bit more focused [url]http://research.opt.indiana.edu/Library/Mopane2003/CampbellC2/Campbell_C_2.pdf[/url] You can diagnose them but you will never be able to correct them with a simple lens or even a fancy shaped eyeglass lens. But contact lens might be a possibility (though I suspect you can't register them with the properly). It's possible laser eye surgery might go in this direction though right now some of the failures of laser eye surgery are due to higher order aberrations. If you can using interesting systems (spatial light modulators ... they're not just for Loony Tunes cartoons ;) ) you might be able to correct some of these in the future. See this paper: [url]http://www.eurocongress.com.pl/do2005/DO_manuscript/lectures/L-044.pdf[/url] Imagine an image stablizing, abberation correcting and user adapting binocular of The Future ... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optical quality versus the whole package...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top