What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Opticron
Opticron Binoculars, focussing problem.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Keebs" data-source="post: 3328019" data-attributes="member: 97605"><p>My last word, for the hard of perceiving.</p><p></p><p>My own circumstances (of no interest or business of this forum) at the time of the first repair meant that my best and cheapest option was a courier pick-up, insured of course. £16.80</p><p>At this point my first recourse should have been to take them back to the retailer, but Opticron kindly offered to deal with the repair direct.</p><p>This was a better option for me than taking them back to the retailer and so this cost although unwelcome is not an issue.</p><p>Stuff breaks you take it back to the shop.</p><p>My first post in this thread states quite clearly customer service not an issue</p><p>Thank you Opticron.</p><p></p><p>First repair done.</p><p>First repair failed.</p><p></p><p>Opticron did what I consider to be the right thing yet again and arranged and paid for a courier to pick them up for a second repair. (Let’s just ignore the screwed up collection for now!)</p><p>Personally I think this should have been a replacement. So do Opticron.</p><p>Thank you Opticron.</p><p></p><p>Second repair done</p><p>Second repair failed</p><p></p><p>At this point I firmly believe that my costs should have gone no further.</p><p>I did not break the bins and I did not make the unsuccessful repairs.</p><p>I believe that as with the first unsuccessful repair, a courier should have been sent and paid for, rather than us sharing it on a rota basis.</p><p>How many times should you have to take the same broken item back to the shop?</p><p></p><p>So you ask what I want?</p><p></p><p>1. What I wanted was a pair of working Explorers for £219 - this I happily accepted but they broke</p><p>2. What I wanted was a pair of working Explorers for £235.80 - this I happily accepted but they broke</p><p>3. I was offered a pair of working Naturas as a replacement - this I happily accepted.</p><p>4. I was asked to spend more money returning the Explorers bringing the cost of the Naturas up to virtually retail price for me - this I did not accept, not only on price but on principle. Their failed repair, their courier in (just) my own opinion.</p><p></p><p></p><p>No doubt the Naturas are even better than the Explorers and I really loved those, but on the off-chance that the much narrower field of view was not to my liking/taste/benefit, the prospect of further costs returning them, sending my outlay to above the retail cost, (and still no binoculars) made this less of a generous offer than on the face of it, it might seem.</p><p>From Opticron’s point of view they’ve made what appears to be a great offer.</p><p>From my own standpoint it doesn’t quite add up.</p><p></p><p>Who knows? maybe the profit margin on a £200 (and out of date) binocular is prohibitive for them to be able to offer anything else but whatever the reason we’ve agreed to differ and settled on a refund.</p><p>Unfortunate but just one of those things.</p><p>Opticron make great binoculars and I wish them all the best.</p><p></p><p>Both myself and the two Opticron guys have been very civil, calm and rational on here (Thank you Opticron again) so it would be nice if anyone feels they have anything else to add that they might do the same.</p><p></p><p>Otherwise let’s just let this slip down the boards like it deserves to <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Keebs, post: 3328019, member: 97605"] My last word, for the hard of perceiving. My own circumstances (of no interest or business of this forum) at the time of the first repair meant that my best and cheapest option was a courier pick-up, insured of course. £16.80 At this point my first recourse should have been to take them back to the retailer, but Opticron kindly offered to deal with the repair direct. This was a better option for me than taking them back to the retailer and so this cost although unwelcome is not an issue. Stuff breaks you take it back to the shop. My first post in this thread states quite clearly customer service not an issue Thank you Opticron. First repair done. First repair failed. Opticron did what I consider to be the right thing yet again and arranged and paid for a courier to pick them up for a second repair. (Let’s just ignore the screwed up collection for now!) Personally I think this should have been a replacement. So do Opticron. Thank you Opticron. Second repair done Second repair failed At this point I firmly believe that my costs should have gone no further. I did not break the bins and I did not make the unsuccessful repairs. I believe that as with the first unsuccessful repair, a courier should have been sent and paid for, rather than us sharing it on a rota basis. How many times should you have to take the same broken item back to the shop? So you ask what I want? 1. What I wanted was a pair of working Explorers for £219 - this I happily accepted but they broke 2. What I wanted was a pair of working Explorers for £235.80 - this I happily accepted but they broke 3. I was offered a pair of working Naturas as a replacement - this I happily accepted. 4. I was asked to spend more money returning the Explorers bringing the cost of the Naturas up to virtually retail price for me - this I did not accept, not only on price but on principle. Their failed repair, their courier in (just) my own opinion. No doubt the Naturas are even better than the Explorers and I really loved those, but on the off-chance that the much narrower field of view was not to my liking/taste/benefit, the prospect of further costs returning them, sending my outlay to above the retail cost, (and still no binoculars) made this less of a generous offer than on the face of it, it might seem. From Opticron’s point of view they’ve made what appears to be a great offer. From my own standpoint it doesn’t quite add up. Who knows? maybe the profit margin on a £200 (and out of date) binocular is prohibitive for them to be able to offer anything else but whatever the reason we’ve agreed to differ and settled on a refund. Unfortunate but just one of those things. Opticron make great binoculars and I wish them all the best. Both myself and the two Opticron guys have been very civil, calm and rational on here (Thank you Opticron again) so it would be nice if anyone feels they have anything else to add that they might do the same. Otherwise let’s just let this slip down the boards like it deserves to ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Opticron
Opticron Binoculars, focussing problem.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top