What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optimize for size and weight at expense of optical performance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="denco@comcast.n" data-source="post: 3370281" data-attributes="member: 25300"><p><strong><em>Ok. This question is for both Perterra and Gilmore Girl. Is size an imporant part of that ergonomic equation? Let's say hypothetically you had to pick between a Zeiss HT 8x42 and a Leica Ultravid Plus 8x42. They both have wonderful ergonomics after you try them out. They both fit your hands perfect, the focus is perfectly placed and the balance on both feels great BUT the Zeiss is much bigger than the compact Leica. When you try them out to test the optics you notice the Zeiss HT is a little bit brighter than the Leica. Based on that information which one would you choose? </em></strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="denco@comcast.n, post: 3370281, member: 25300"] [B][I]Ok. This question is for both Perterra and Gilmore Girl. Is size an imporant part of that ergonomic equation? Let's say hypothetically you had to pick between a Zeiss HT 8x42 and a Leica Ultravid Plus 8x42. They both have wonderful ergonomics after you try them out. They both fit your hands perfect, the focus is perfectly placed and the balance on both feels great BUT the Zeiss is much bigger than the compact Leica. When you try them out to test the optics you notice the Zeiss HT is a little bit brighter than the Leica. Based on that information which one would you choose? [/I][/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optimize for size and weight at expense of optical performance?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top