What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optimize for size and weight at expense of optical performance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="chill6x6" data-source="post: 3370285" data-attributes="member: 130888"><p>Sure...Leica does this. But as mentioned above....the size difference seems to be mostly about eye relief and FOV. Let's be real for a second...while there IS a difference optically between say a SV 8.5X42 and a UV HD + 8X42...the difference optically is SMALL....REALLY small. And the difference in size/weight, PARTICULARLY size...can be a good bit!</p><p></p><p>Perfect example....next Friday Ashlee and I are flying to San Juan to go on a cruise. One of the ports of call is St Kitts where we are going birding. IF I take a 42mm binocular, there is 100% chance it will be a Leica due to size/weight. Probably a Leica and 32mm SV....maybe two Leica's. I can think of several reasons it is a good thinking to take/pack compact optics on such a trip. </p><p></p><p>Anyone think our birding trip will be hampered because a 42mm SV or Zeiss didn't make the trip?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="chill6x6, post: 3370285, member: 130888"] Sure...Leica does this. But as mentioned above....the size difference seems to be mostly about eye relief and FOV. Let's be real for a second...while there IS a difference optically between say a SV 8.5X42 and a UV HD + 8X42...the difference optically is SMALL....REALLY small. And the difference in size/weight, PARTICULARLY size...can be a good bit! Perfect example....next Friday Ashlee and I are flying to San Juan to go on a cruise. One of the ports of call is St Kitts where we are going birding. IF I take a 42mm binocular, there is 100% chance it will be a Leica due to size/weight. Probably a Leica and 32mm SV....maybe two Leica's. I can think of several reasons it is a good thinking to take/pack compact optics on such a trip. Anyone think our birding trip will be hampered because a 42mm SV or Zeiss didn't make the trip? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Optimize for size and weight at expense of optical performance?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top